Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #4185

Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Lew <noone@lewscanon.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions
Date Mon, 16 May 2011 21:28:21 -0400
Organization albasani.net
Lines 25
Message-ID <iqsivb$b00$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink)
References <2ptyczln7x.fsf@shell.xmission.com> <iqmhbr$7kh$1@dont-email.me> <2pei3zkhw1.fsf@shell.xmission.com> <JMCdnZdUS79lUUzQnZ2dnUVZ_gOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace news.albasani.net Mafhpyh0pj8euJEuD25J/zOzSwBN2TvQWv/dJjVsTyzQeQMCtQg2GepDQ0zeqVRdnau/O9IiV7r4I59snWSMlAzuY+sXHR81UGaRxcU2cTJJW73Y1rvseQaqW8BSS/8U
NNTP-Posting-Date Tue, 17 May 2011 01:28:11 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info news.albasani.net; logging-data="3c2xllVAkOwwpghkCLIu8mbMnFdMyorJ80r6eJwElYUeXfg+ubs6TM9wYwSnFt4Rakh3xtxQuEEW0grrjOrOD6OtFi4qKWXvgmW15nPXR9qYuqhzYCg/KJupJ4TYj3qj"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net"
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10
In-Reply-To <JMCdnZdUS79lUUzQnZ2dnUVZ_gOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Cancel-Lock sha1:0oeBsfi3BwTEMOFqiilMK5Y2RLQ=
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:4185

Show key headers only | View raw


jebblue wrote:
> Jim Janney wrote:
>> Stanimir Stamenkov writes:
>>> Jim Janney:
>>>> The default spell checker in Eclipse doesn't think plugin is a word.
>>>> OK, I can kind of see that.  But it doesn't like registry either.
>>>> Hello?

>>> Just add the words to your user dictionary.

>> Of course.  I just found it amusing that Eclipse, well-known for its
>> registry-based plugin architecture, would flag these words as possible
>> misspellings.

> Plug-in is hyphenated. Plugin is not a word. Why is that surprising.

<http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/plugin>

> What is really fun is how NetBeans looks more and more like Eclipse
> every release.

Nah.

-- 
Lew

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Eclipse spell checker omissions Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-05-12 13:42 -0600
  Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-13 14:44 +1200
  Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2011-05-14 21:23 +0300
    Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-05-15 11:12 -0600
      Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2011-05-16 01:17 +0300
        Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-05-16 08:51 -0600
          Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-16 11:22 -0400
      Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-16 14:25 +1200
        Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-15 22:28 -0400
      Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions jebblue <n@n.nnn> - 2011-05-16 20:18 -0500
        Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-16 21:28 -0400
        Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-05-17 07:53 -0600
          Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-05-17 09:40 -0600
            Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-17 11:53 -0400
              OT: Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions RedGrittyBrick <RedGrittyBrick@spamweary.invalid> - 2011-05-17 18:04 +0100
                Re: OT: Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-18 00:06 -0400

csiph-web