Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #4221
| From | Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions |
| Date | 2011-05-17 09:40 -0600 |
| Organization | As little as possible |
| Message-ID | <2pr57xibe6.fsf@shell.xmission.com> (permalink) |
| References | <2ptyczln7x.fsf@shell.xmission.com> <iqmhbr$7kh$1@dont-email.me> <2pei3zkhw1.fsf@shell.xmission.com> <JMCdnZdUS79lUUzQnZ2dnUVZ_gOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <2pvcx9igb2.fsf@shell.xmission.com> |
Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> writes: > jebblue <n@n.nnn> writes: > >> On Sun, 15 May 2011 11:12:14 -0600, Jim Janney wrote: >> >>> Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> writes: >>> >>>> Thu, 12 May 2011 13:42:42 -0600, /Jim Janney/: >>>> >>>>> The default spell checker in Eclipse doesn't think plugin is a word. >>>>> OK, I can kind of see that. But it doesn't like registry either. >>>>> Hello? >>>> >>>> Just add the words to your user dictionary. >>> >>> Of course. I just found it amusing that Eclipse, well-known for its >>> registry-based plugin architecture, would flag these words as possible >>> misspellings. >> >> Plug-in is hyphenated. Plugin is not a word. Why is that surprising. > > One can argue whether it's a word, but it's definitely not a > misspelling: many things that are not words are also not misspellings. > And I didn't say surprising, only amusing, although I will plead guilty > to being easily amused at times. Now that I look carefully at the Eclipse documentation, I see they are consistent in spelling it plug-in. That's very different. Never mind :-) -- Jim Janney
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Eclipse spell checker omissions Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-05-12 13:42 -0600
Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-13 14:44 +1200
Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2011-05-14 21:23 +0300
Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-05-15 11:12 -0600
Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2011-05-16 01:17 +0300
Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-05-16 08:51 -0600
Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-16 11:22 -0400
Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-16 14:25 +1200
Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-15 22:28 -0400
Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions jebblue <n@n.nnn> - 2011-05-16 20:18 -0500
Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-16 21:28 -0400
Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-05-17 07:53 -0600
Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-05-17 09:40 -0600
Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-17 11:53 -0400
OT: Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions RedGrittyBrick <RedGrittyBrick@spamweary.invalid> - 2011-05-17 18:04 +0100
Re: OT: Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-18 00:06 -0400
csiph-web