Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #2763

Re: Binary Search

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	"Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Binary Search
Date	Sat, 2 Apr 2011 08:58:55 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	5
Message-ID	<in7h33$arv$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<rb2mo6duf1kn037937sjrtht07omn3jdkm@4ax.com> <D-WdnU20qutjjRbQnZ2dnUVZ87-dnZ2d@telenor.com> <tllmo6h8hae1ha3d202ql6ok1i5v922g1c@4ax.com> <j4-dnaLPsuq9wRbQnZ2dnUVZ8783t52d@telenor.com> <ohlno6t4rn1g9rd020immcdko7r448cjo1@4ax.com> <imouja$56s$2@lust.ihug.co.nz> <imp8c9$nkf$1@dont-email.me> <in6oj8$5b5$3@lust.ihug.co.nz> <in7di3$tu$1@dont-email.me> <in7eb0$ug9$1@news.albasani.net>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
Injection-Date	Sat, 2 Apr 2011 15:58:27 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	mx03.eternal-september.org; posting-host="nPgGKe3051Y3NHz75zStxg"; logging-data="11135"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19amb01P0LxlHGHm+g2oEdHCJjZAvX43tg="
X-MimeOLE	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
In-Reply-To	<in7eb0$ug9$1@news.albasani.net>
X-Newsreader	Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
Importance	Normal
Cancel-Lock	sha1:6Hw4HsH3Tlloioau7qbTMQDy29Q=
X-Priority	3
X-MSMail-Priority	Normal
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:2763

Show key headers only | View raw


"Lew" <noone@lewscanon.com> wrote in message 
news:in7eb0$ug9$1@news.albasani.net...
> Mike Schilling wrote:
>> "Lawrence D'Oliveiro" wrote:
>>> So why isn’t there a single-argument overload of the put method to save 
>>> you
>>> the trouble?
>>
>> There is, if you use a Set instead of a Map. Which, for sorting, works 
>> equally
>> well.
>
> In the standard API, HashSet<E> is implemented as a Map<E, E> under the 
> hood, as is TreeSet<E>.  "Lawrence" could spend its time profitably by 
> studying the Javadocs.

To be fair, it wasn't Lawrence who said that Maps don't work with embedded 
keys.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Binary Search Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-02 22:00 +1300
  Re: Binary Search Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-04-02 05:07 -0500
    Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-02 07:59 -0700
      Re: Binary Search Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-04-02 10:37 -0500
        Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-02 08:57 -0700
          Re: Binary Search Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-03 12:40 +1200
  Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-02 07:58 -0700
    Re: Binary Search Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-02 11:11 -0400
      Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-02 08:58 -0700
    Re: Binary Search Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-03 00:11 +0100
      Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-02 16:52 -0700
        Re: Binary Search Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-03 18:50 +0100
          Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-03 12:01 -0700
            Re: Binary Search Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-03 22:39 +0100
              Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-03 16:37 -0700
                Re: Binary Search Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-06 15:24 -0400
                OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm@myrealbox.com> - 2011-04-11 13:53 +0000
                Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Lew <lew@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-11 11:45 -0700
                Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-04-11 14:11 -0500
                Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Lew <lew@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-11 13:48 -0700
                Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-11 22:16 +0100
                Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-11 17:54 -0400
                Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-11 23:35 +0100
                Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-04-11 21:41 -0500
                Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm@myrealbox.com> - 2011-04-14 10:11 +0000
                Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Jerry Gerrone <scuzwalla@gmail.com> - 2011-04-14 20:12 -0700
      Re: Binary Search Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-04-05 16:01 +0100

csiph-web