Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #2732
| From | Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Binary Search |
| Followup-To | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Date | 2011-04-02 22:00 +1300 |
| Organization | Geek Central |
| Message-ID | <in6oj8$5b5$3@lust.ihug.co.nz> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <tllmo6h8hae1ha3d202ql6ok1i5v922g1c@4ax.com> <j4-dnaLPsuq9wRbQnZ2dnUVZ8783t52d@telenor.com> <ohlno6t4rn1g9rd020immcdko7r448cjo1@4ax.com> <imouja$56s$2@lust.ihug.co.nz> <imp8c9$nkf$1@dont-email.me> |
Followups directed to: comp.lang.java.programmer
In message <imp8c9$nkf$1@dont-email.me>, Mike Schilling wrote: > "Lawrence D'Oliveiro" <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> wrote in message > news:imouja$56s$2@lust.ihug.co.nz... > >> In message <ohlno6t4rn1g9rd020immcdko7r448cjo1@4ax.com>, Roedy Green >> wrote: >> >>> The problem is, Map and SortedMap don't "map" well onto binary search. >>> binary search to work properly requires embedded keys. Maps require >>> them separate. >> >> Sounds like the Java Map classes are not well designed. > > Or that someone doesn't understand them. Embedded keys can be made to > work perfectly well with SortedMaps simply by making both arguments to > put() the same, and providing a comparator that can locate the key in the > object. So why isn’t there a single-argument overload of the put method to save you the trouble?
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Binary Search Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-02 22:00 +1300
Re: Binary Search Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-04-02 05:07 -0500
Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-02 07:59 -0700
Re: Binary Search Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-04-02 10:37 -0500
Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-02 08:57 -0700
Re: Binary Search Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-03 12:40 +1200
Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-02 07:58 -0700
Re: Binary Search Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-02 11:11 -0400
Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-02 08:58 -0700
Re: Binary Search Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-03 00:11 +0100
Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-02 16:52 -0700
Re: Binary Search Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-03 18:50 +0100
Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-03 12:01 -0700
Re: Binary Search Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-03 22:39 +0100
Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-03 16:37 -0700
Re: Binary Search Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-06 15:24 -0400
OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm@myrealbox.com> - 2011-04-11 13:53 +0000
Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Lew <lew@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-11 11:45 -0700
Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-04-11 14:11 -0500
Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Lew <lew@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-11 13:48 -0700
Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-11 22:16 +0100
Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-11 17:54 -0400
Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-11 23:35 +0100
Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-04-11 21:41 -0500
Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm@myrealbox.com> - 2011-04-14 10:11 +0000
Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Jerry Gerrone <scuzwalla@gmail.com> - 2011-04-14 20:12 -0700
Re: Binary Search Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-04-05 16:01 +0100
csiph-web