Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #2760

Re: Binary Search

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Lew <noone@lewscanon.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Binary Search
Date	Sat, 02 Apr 2011 11:11:30 -0400
Organization	albasani.net
Lines	16
Message-ID	<in7eb0$ug9$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink)
References	<rb2mo6duf1kn037937sjrtht07omn3jdkm@4ax.com> <D-WdnU20qutjjRbQnZ2dnUVZ87-dnZ2d@telenor.com> <tllmo6h8hae1ha3d202ql6ok1i5v922g1c@4ax.com> <j4-dnaLPsuq9wRbQnZ2dnUVZ8783t52d@telenor.com> <ohlno6t4rn1g9rd020immcdko7r448cjo1@4ax.com> <imouja$56s$2@lust.ihug.co.nz> <imp8c9$nkf$1@dont-email.me> <in6oj8$5b5$3@lust.ihug.co.nz> <in7di3$tu$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Trace	news.albasani.net BPhzmu485d28gPdb9/UjmnH0UaQEtdq9tzkp4zB9Dqi3XmmyU71GftzEfrVTy/U+/mk2ycqQ4dLss5vE70ug4A==
NNTP-Posting-Date	Sat, 2 Apr 2011 15:11:28 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	news.albasani.net; logging-data="1jhvhBOGGAOj/w8ewZGWcnVq0LaJbg/mjfZv6P91gDwK5X24koXDxS+Ca6fr8zkqcDAoPZwl6bz41RG1GppMYC1kzWGU+wRhJiYXfN800TPCSHv42oo5DTdZRisilqKN"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net"
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8
In-Reply-To	<in7di3$tu$1@dont-email.me>
Cancel-Lock	sha1:1W6lwC1kTcnTitJ4KngYE1tY0Ho=
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:2760

Show key headers only | View raw

Mike Schilling wrote:
> "Lawrence D'Oliveiro" wrote:
>> So why isn’t there a single-argument overload of the put method to save you
>> the trouble?
>
> There is, if you use a Set instead of a Map. Which, for sorting, works equally
> well.

In the standard API, HashSet<E> is implemented as a Map<E, E> under the hood, 
as is TreeSet<E>.  "Lawrence" could spend its time profitably by studying the 
Javadocs.

-- 
Lew
Honi soit qui mal y pense.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Friz.jpg

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Binary Search Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-02 22:00 +1300
  Re: Binary Search Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-04-02 05:07 -0500
    Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-02 07:59 -0700
      Re: Binary Search Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-04-02 10:37 -0500
        Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-02 08:57 -0700
          Re: Binary Search Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-03 12:40 +1200
  Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-02 07:58 -0700
    Re: Binary Search Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-02 11:11 -0400
      Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-02 08:58 -0700
    Re: Binary Search Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-03 00:11 +0100
      Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-02 16:52 -0700
        Re: Binary Search Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-03 18:50 +0100
          Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-03 12:01 -0700
            Re: Binary Search Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-03 22:39 +0100
              Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-03 16:37 -0700
                Re: Binary Search Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-06 15:24 -0400
                OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm@myrealbox.com> - 2011-04-11 13:53 +0000
                Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Lew <lew@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-11 11:45 -0700
                Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-04-11 14:11 -0500
                Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Lew <lew@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-11 13:48 -0700
                Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-11 22:16 +0100
                Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-11 17:54 -0400
                Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-11 23:35 +0100
                Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-04-11 21:41 -0500
                Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm@myrealbox.com> - 2011-04-14 10:11 +0000
                Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Jerry Gerrone <scuzwalla@gmail.com> - 2011-04-14 20:12 -0700
      Re: Binary Search Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-04-05 16:01 +0100

csiph-web