Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #2733

Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods

From Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods
Date 2011-04-02 11:23 +0200
Organization Netfront http://www.netfront.net/
Message-ID <MPG.2801085a92724d6898969e@202.177.16.121> (permalink)
References <2f38bb8e-9a8d-4464-ad3d-b9ce0b557219@e21g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


In article <2f38bb8e-9a8d-4464-ad3d-b9ce0b557219
@e21g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, shortcutter@googlemail.com says...
> 
> All,
> 
> I am just musing about the pros and cons of using boolean properties
> in enum classes vs. custom methods.
>  So far I found
> 
> pro Properties:
> - less classes
> - when adding enum values to an enum you cannot forget to define
> properties
> 
> pro Methods:
> - smaller memory footprint per instance

Quite frankly: Use what's easier to read and maintain.
Memory and runtime should be your smallest concern, assuming you use 
some common sense when chosing your algorithm, only if there's clearly a 
problem for the user and the system you should optimize to something 
probably less readable. To find bottlenecks, don't guess, but use a 
profiling tool. "jvisualvm" (which you can find in your jdk/bin folder) 
is not bad for a start.

> Example
>   /** We use boolean properties. */
>   public enum Prop {
> 
>     A(true, true), B(true, false), C(false, true);
> 
>     private final boolean a;
> 
>     private final boolean b;
> 
>     Prop(boolean a, boolean b) {
>       this.a = a;
>       this.b = b;
>     }
> 
>     public boolean isA() {
>       return a;
>     }
> 
>     public boolean isB() {
>       return b;
>     }
>   }

Like proposed elsewhere you could also write (untested):

   public enum Prop {
     //@formatter:off
     A(){
       public boolean isA(){return true;}
       public boolean isB(){return true;}

     }, 
     B(){
       public boolean isA(){return true;}
       public boolean isB(){return false;}
     },
     C(){
       public boolean isA(){return false;}
       public boolean isB(){return true;}
     }
     ;
     //@formatter:on

     public abstract boolean isA();
     public abstract boolean isB();
   }


Consider that the use of boolean parameters is often quite bad to read 
and maintain. Just have a look at your boolean initializer:

  A(true, true), B(true, false), C(false, true);

You can't tell from looking at the code, whether the first argument 
represents the return value for "isA" or "isB". From this point of view, 
with a proper formatting, I'd prefer the abstract method approach.

Regarding the use of boolean parameters I have, some time ago written, a 
blog you might like to read:
http://brixomatic.wordpress.com/2010/02/24/boolean-harmful/

Kind regards,
-Wanja-

-- 
..Alesi's problem was that the back of the car was jumping up and down 
dangerously - and I can assure you from having been teammate to 
Jean Alesi and knowing what kind of cars that he can pull up with, 
when Jean Alesi says that a car is dangerous - it is. [Jonathan Palmer]

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Enums: Properties vs. Methods Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-03-29 08:18 -0700
  Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-03-29 11:47 -0400
    Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-03-30 20:00 +0200
      Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Lew <lew@lewscanon.com> - 2011-03-30 13:17 -0700
        Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-03-31 00:48 -0700
          Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-03-31 08:41 -0400
            Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-03-31 08:26 -0700
              Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-03-31 22:16 -0400
                Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-02 11:56 +0200
                Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-02 10:29 -0400
                Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-03 13:14 +0200
  Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods markspace <-@.> - 2011-03-29 09:26 -0700
    Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-03-30 20:06 +0200
      Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods markspace <-@.> - 2011-03-30 12:40 -0700
        Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-03-31 00:38 -0700
  Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-03-29 19:03 +0200
    Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-03-29 19:04 +0200
  Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-03-29 12:49 -0700
  Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-03-29 12:52 -0700
    Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-03-29 22:45 +0200
      Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-03-29 17:08 -0400
        Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-03-29 23:25 +0200
          Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-03-29 19:05 -0400
            Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-03-29 19:40 -0400
              Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-03-31 02:57 -0700
                Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-03-31 08:52 -0400
                Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-03-31 08:54 -0400
            Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-03-30 18:40 +0200
              Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Lew <lew@lewscanon.com> - 2011-03-30 10:33 -0700
                Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-03-30 20:43 +0200
                Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Lew <lew@lewscanon.com> - 2011-03-30 13:20 -0700
                Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-03-31 08:55 -0400
  Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-02 11:23 +0200
    Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-02 10:36 -0400
      Re: Enums: Properties vs. Methods Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-02 21:20 +0200

csiph-web