Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #26144
| Path | csiph.com!eeepc.pasdenom.info!news.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.albasani.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds |
| Date | Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:33:11 -0500 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Lines | 39 |
| Message-ID | <ij2e4t$5kf$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <87oc6mi2nl.fsf@web.de> <iist2a$2oh$1@news.eternal-september.org> <87aai5k75w.fsf@web.de> <iiu3pa$rj$1@news.albasani.net> <4d5333ba$0$23762$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <ij0oeh$p2b$1@news.albasani.net> <4d54a6be$0$23759$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Trace | news.albasani.net nfVi9/WQ2DhC4JNMtZ/RxBRNeJhY1KJyaV7n5pmI2f2TYslqefPTNXWKe/XIqwELKsuwuhqexERFS16G+7LqpQ== |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Fri, 11 Feb 2011 04:32:29 +0000 (UTC) |
| In-Reply-To | <4d54a6be$0$23759$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:jKCDSfT2uQ6PbfHqZanpx8r7rn4= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
| Injection-Info | news.albasani.net; logging-data="1e7KOjACbQYkLHqdlhZklVKipEctgbyOpNBlolqeQrFzAv4ujeSulMRN0Ujtl9CcSdq5LcLhKL+m/38E2KzBGZUW19yEDRFISLyKAavXgJtmU/RgkA7WYN8iinNL9BLR"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net" |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:26144 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Arne Vajhøj wrote: > The 90-10 were not statistical information but magnitude indication. > Like in 10% of the code use 90% of the time, 90% of the project takes > 90% of the time and the 10% also takes 90% of the time. > > Maven is pretty widely used. > > And I know of several projects that are happy using it. > > Real world projects can be relative simple in build. I would even > say that they should be relative simple in build. Complex builds > are usually a symptom of a bigger problem in the app. > > Of course projects with problems, complex builds and Maven not > working properly is still common. > >> The project I'm on isn't even especially complicated, except for the >> Maven builds. I wish it were based on Ant, but converting back once it's >> tangled up in Maven is not straightforward. None of us, not even my >> management (!), is happy with Maven. > > Personally I prefer ant over Maven - I like the ability to code > my build. But from a project perspective coding the build > is just extra cost. I'll take a fresh look. -- Lew Ceci n'est pas une fenêtre. .___________. |###] | [###| |##/ | *\##| |#/ * | \#| |#----|----#| || | * || |o * | o| |_____|_____| |===========|
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Dependency resolution in Java builds Markus Gessner <nospam@nospam.com> - 2011-02-08 23:26 +0100
Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Michal Kleczek <kleku75@gmail.com> - 2011-02-10 14:17 +0000
Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-10 19:08 -0500
Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-02-09 14:59 -0800
Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-09 08:02 -0500
Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Markus Gessner <nospam@nospam.com> - 2011-02-09 08:06 +0100
Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-02-09 23:56 +0000
Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-10 08:09 -0500
Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-02-09 14:52 -0800
Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-09 19:39 -0500
Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-10 23:33 -0500
Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-10 22:02 -0500
Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-08 22:14 -0500
Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-02-10 14:59 -0700
Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Markus Gessner <nospam@nospam.com> - 2011-02-09 08:18 +0100
Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-09 18:43 -0500
Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-02-09 15:50 -0800
Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-09 08:11 -0500
Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-02-09 15:03 -0800
Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-02-09 20:51 -0800
Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-02-09 23:28 +0000
Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-08 21:03 -0500
Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-02-09 23:26 +0000
Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds markspace <nospam@nowhere.com> - 2011-02-08 18:10 -0800
csiph-web