Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #26144

Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds

Path csiph.com!eeepc.pasdenom.info!news.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.albasani.net!not-for-mail
From Lew <noone@lewscanon.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds
Date Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:33:11 -0500
Organization albasani.net
Lines 39
Message-ID <ij2e4t$5kf$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink)
References <87oc6mi2nl.fsf@web.de> <iist2a$2oh$1@news.eternal-september.org> <87aai5k75w.fsf@web.de> <iiu3pa$rj$1@news.albasani.net> <4d5333ba$0$23762$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <ij0oeh$p2b$1@news.albasani.net> <4d54a6be$0$23759$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Trace news.albasani.net nfVi9/WQ2DhC4JNMtZ/RxBRNeJhY1KJyaV7n5pmI2f2TYslqefPTNXWKe/XIqwELKsuwuhqexERFS16G+7LqpQ==
NNTP-Posting-Date Fri, 11 Feb 2011 04:32:29 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To <4d54a6be$0$23759$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
Cancel-Lock sha1:jKCDSfT2uQ6PbfHqZanpx8r7rn4=
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7
Injection-Info news.albasani.net; logging-data="1e7KOjACbQYkLHqdlhZklVKipEctgbyOpNBlolqeQrFzAv4ujeSulMRN0Ujtl9CcSdq5LcLhKL+m/38E2KzBGZUW19yEDRFISLyKAavXgJtmU/RgkA7WYN8iinNL9BLR"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net"
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:26144

Show key headers only | View raw


Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> The 90-10 were not statistical information but magnitude indication.
> Like in 10% of the code use 90% of the time, 90% of the project takes
> 90% of the time and the 10% also takes 90% of the time.
>
> Maven is pretty widely used.
>
> And I know of several projects that are happy using it.
>
> Real world projects can be relative simple in build. I would even
> say that they should be relative simple in build. Complex builds
> are usually a symptom of a bigger problem in the app.
>
> Of course projects with problems, complex builds and Maven not
> working properly is still common.
>
>> The project I'm on isn't even especially complicated, except for the
>> Maven builds. I wish it were based on Ant, but converting back once it's
>> tangled up in Maven is not straightforward. None of us, not even my
>> management (!), is happy with Maven.
>
> Personally I prefer ant over Maven - I like the ability to code
> my build. But from a project perspective coding the build
> is just extra cost.

I'll take a fresh look.

-- 
Lew
Ceci n'est pas une fenêtre.
.___________.
|###] | [###|
|##/  | *\##|
|#/ * |   \#|
|#----|----#|
||    |  * ||
|o *  |    o|
|_____|_____|
|===========|

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Dependency resolution in Java builds Markus Gessner <nospam@nospam.com> - 2011-02-08 23:26 +0100
  Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Michal Kleczek <kleku75@gmail.com> - 2011-02-10 14:17 +0000
    Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-10 19:08 -0500
  Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-02-09 14:59 -0800
  Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-09 08:02 -0500
  Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Markus Gessner <nospam@nospam.com> - 2011-02-09 08:06 +0100
  Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-02-09 23:56 +0000
    Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-10 08:09 -0500
  Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-02-09 14:52 -0800
  Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-09 19:39 -0500
    Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-10 23:33 -0500
    Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-10 22:02 -0500
  Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-08 22:14 -0500
  Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-02-10 14:59 -0700
  Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Markus Gessner <nospam@nospam.com> - 2011-02-09 08:18 +0100
    Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-09 18:43 -0500
      Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-02-09 15:50 -0800
    Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-09 08:11 -0500
      Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-02-09 15:03 -0800
  Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-02-09 20:51 -0800
  Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-02-09 23:28 +0000
  Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-08 21:03 -0500
  Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-02-09 23:26 +0000
  Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds markspace <nospam@nowhere.com> - 2011-02-08 18:10 -0800

csiph-web