Path: csiph.com!eeepc.pasdenom.info!news.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.albasani.net!not-for-mail From: Lew Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:33:11 -0500 Organization: albasani.net Lines: 39 Message-ID: References: <87oc6mi2nl.fsf@web.de> <87aai5k75w.fsf@web.de> <4d5333ba$0$23762$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <4d54a6be$0$23759$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.albasani.net nfVi9/WQ2DhC4JNMtZ/RxBRNeJhY1KJyaV7n5pmI2f2TYslqefPTNXWKe/XIqwELKsuwuhqexERFS16G+7LqpQ== NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 04:32:29 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <4d54a6be$0$23759$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> Cancel-Lock: sha1:jKCDSfT2uQ6PbfHqZanpx8r7rn4= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 Injection-Info: news.albasani.net; logging-data="1e7KOjACbQYkLHqdlhZklVKipEctgbyOpNBlolqeQrFzAv4ujeSulMRN0Ujtl9CcSdq5LcLhKL+m/38E2KzBGZUW19yEDRFISLyKAavXgJtmU/RgkA7WYN8iinNL9BLR"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net" Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:26144 Arne Vajhøj wrote: > The 90-10 were not statistical information but magnitude indication. > Like in 10% of the code use 90% of the time, 90% of the project takes > 90% of the time and the 10% also takes 90% of the time. > > Maven is pretty widely used. > > And I know of several projects that are happy using it. > > Real world projects can be relative simple in build. I would even > say that they should be relative simple in build. Complex builds > are usually a symptom of a bigger problem in the app. > > Of course projects with problems, complex builds and Maven not > working properly is still common. > >> The project I'm on isn't even especially complicated, except for the >> Maven builds. I wish it were based on Ant, but converting back once it's >> tangled up in Maven is not straightforward. None of us, not even my >> management (!), is happy with Maven. > > Personally I prefer ant over Maven - I like the ability to code > my build. But from a project perspective coding the build > is just extra cost. I'll take a fresh look. -- Lew Ceci n'est pas une fenêtre. .___________. |###] | [###| |##/ | *\##| |#/ * | \#| |#----|----#| || | * || |o * | o| |_____|_____| |===========|