Path: csiph.com!eeepc.pasdenom.info!news.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!203.109.252.33.MISMATCH!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!lust.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Java vs C++ Followup-To: comp.lang.java.programmer Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 14:51:38 +1300 Organization: Geek Central Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 118-92-86-70.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Trace: lust.ihug.co.nz 1297043498 7779 118.92.86.70 (7 Feb 2011 01:51:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@ihug.co.nz NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 01:51:38 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: KNode/4.4.7 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:26067 In message , Joshua Cranmer wrote: > On 02/06/2011 06:54 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >> Strange that Java never copied the C++ operator names "and”, “or” and >> “not”. > > Why should it have? They're just aliases for other objects. They’re not objects, they’re operator names.