Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #6674

Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date	Sat, 30 Jul 2011 08:10:58 -0500
Date	Sat, 30 Jul 2011 06:10:57 -0700
From	Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org>
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version	1.0
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted
References	<37e4697b-5aab-42ef-a1e5-3ce5a6d866a8@e15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <j0rok2$t9e$1@dont-email.me> <environment-20110728170428@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <00f3e49b-fb85-463b-bc8f-9de92c6b9445@fq4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <308ec906-7338-4cd4-aa6e-9f1115957c76@d8g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <j10pkk$5uj$1@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To	<j10pkk$5uj$1@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Message-ID	<iMGdnRugVpF-n6nTnZ2dnUVZ_oydnZ2d@earthlink.com> (permalink)
Lines	25
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host	70.230.200.54
X-Trace	sv3-f10DagANCyS2uRWtckRhnARn1P3Y10CZGo4zq/MKHYzXWIAqG2p1iSY1Yi2aiqGOvR0Va5g969b4WUL!mqFQC0I6NuvrGjRijy1/S2EDFCzGP6WN2BVd/pTl7ym9P0MJekRXIBi+xrx6NHtM4LQLwJtKin2t!LBro689M9ZGhzJmZSKEKijiN54AOpBEfduEqhi2+cPRrvw==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	2241
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:6674

Show key headers only | View raw

On 7/30/2011 4:24 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:08:15 -0700, lewbloch wrote:
>
>> Ross wrote:
>>> I just wanted a name more exciting than that. At present it's called
>>> "CentralScrutinizer" which is not the best, and hence it's ripe for
>>> some sed-driven renaming. But I like the idea of this class having a
>>> distinctive name. Particularly since should anyone end up writing any
>>> plugins for my application, they'll have to make use of it.

Why "sed-driven renaming" rather than loading it into e.g. Eclipse and
using Refactor-Rename?

>>
>> Excellent Frank Zappa reference.
>
> CentralScrutinizer should be reserved for a mongo monitoring class. How
> about GrandWazoo ?
>
>

PileOfCoincidentallyCoupledStuff

Patricia

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Really "BIG" class name wanted Ross <rossclement@gmail.com> - 2011-07-28 03:20 -0700
  Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-07-28 03:38 -0700
  Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-07-28 04:01 -0700
  Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted markspace <-@.> - 2011-07-28 06:35 -0700
    Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Ross <rossclement@gmail.com> - 2011-07-29 05:28 -0700
      Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted markspace <-@.> - 2011-07-29 06:36 -0700
      Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-07-29 15:55 +0200
      Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-07-29 14:56 +0100
      Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-07-29 15:08 +0100
      Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Silvio <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-07-29 17:32 +0200
        Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Silvio <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-08-01 13:47 +0200
      Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-29 09:25 -0700
      Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-29 23:08 -0700
        Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-30 11:24 +0000
          Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-07-30 06:10 -0700
            Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-08-01 16:22 -0700
      Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-31 02:29 -0700
      Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-01 14:22 -0700
        Re: "$" in class names reserved [was: Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted] Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> - 2011-08-02 02:33 -0400
    Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Ross <rossclement@gmail.com> - 2011-07-29 05:37 -0700
      Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Bent C Dalager <bcd@pvv.ntnu.no> - 2011-07-30 22:42 +0000
        Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted thoolen <thoolen@tholenbot.thorium> - 2011-07-30 23:38 -0400
  Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted markspace <-@.> - 2011-07-31 20:32 -0700
  Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Silvio <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-08-01 13:54 +0200

csiph-web