Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #6629

Really "BIG" class name wanted

From Ross <rossclement@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Really "BIG" class name wanted
Date 2011-07-28 03:20 -0700
Organization http://groups.google.com
Message-ID <37e4697b-5aab-42ef-a1e5-3ce5a6d866a8@e15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


I'm now building a centralised class for a whole lot of important
functions in a program I'm writing. At present, there are too many
"little" objects that are passed around to parts of the application.
E.g. there's a "PropertyHandler" from/to which properties can be read/
written. There's a global save/load object which can save and load
various types of data items. There's an update notifier so that
updates in one part of the application are sent to other parts of the
application, either end of which might be plugins. Rather than have
too many little object, I'd like to have one "BIG" object which stores
all the little ones, and has methods such as "getPropertyHandler()",
"getSaveLoadMediator()", "getPatchMediator()" etc. This will also
simplify my interface for Plugins.

But given the importance of this central class, I want a really "BIG"
name for it. I could call it "BigMediator", or "ImportantObjects", but
want a more impressive name. Just thought that calling it
"TheCentralScrutinizer" might work, as well as being a tip of the hat
to Frank Zappa. But particularly since this object will be important
for any future plugin writers, I want a really good class name for it.

Any suggestions?

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar


Thread

Really "BIG" class name wanted Ross <rossclement@gmail.com> - 2011-07-28 03:20 -0700
  Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-07-28 03:38 -0700
  Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-07-28 04:01 -0700
  Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted markspace <-@.> - 2011-07-28 06:35 -0700
    Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Ross <rossclement@gmail.com> - 2011-07-29 05:28 -0700
      Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted markspace <-@.> - 2011-07-29 06:36 -0700
      Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-07-29 15:55 +0200
      Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-07-29 14:56 +0100
      Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-07-29 15:08 +0100
      Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Silvio <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-07-29 17:32 +0200
        Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Silvio <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-08-01 13:47 +0200
      Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-29 09:25 -0700
      Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-29 23:08 -0700
        Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-30 11:24 +0000
          Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-07-30 06:10 -0700
            Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-08-01 16:22 -0700
      Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-31 02:29 -0700
      Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-01 14:22 -0700
        Re: "$" in class names reserved [was: Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted] Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> - 2011-08-02 02:33 -0400
    Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Ross <rossclement@gmail.com> - 2011-07-29 05:37 -0700
      Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Bent C Dalager <bcd@pvv.ntnu.no> - 2011-07-30 22:42 +0000
        Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted thoolen <thoolen@tholenbot.thorium> - 2011-07-30 23:38 -0400
  Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted markspace <-@.> - 2011-07-31 20:32 -0700
  Re: Really "BIG" class name wanted Silvio <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-08-01 13:54 +0200

csiph-web