Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #8741
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking |
| Date | Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:02:58 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 18 |
| Message-ID | <fh3c97hcf000tnbd3o9ok1eopb8s7k5098@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <noiq87l3l9umnl3a74u5jd2c0pnlq21dat@4ax.com> <VmAjq.1736$kJ5.902@newsfe03.iad> <c7lu87lm24pmga3rul1am7s0oju6n26p75@4ax.com> <kftu87hmff3ubjti9t8eims2idhqn58l9o@4ax.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1110111908130.2814@urchin.earth.li> <7sudncbWtOTsrQjTnZ2dnUVZ876dnZ2d@telenor.com> <cfvb97ps3s09jfs0fhqdpckhcmnpairumu@4ax.com> <9LqdnfdVAsdGkQvTnZ2dnUVZ876dnZ2d@telenor.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="7Qrvczazr82YckO5XW8Vtw"; logging-data="16273"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+CnNrZcqYKAegyoSHiwRjp4Yw99S6FLCI=" |
| X-Newsreader | Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:K58N47AlZKMeKZx5VNUHmX/Xy90= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:8741 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:55:39 -0500, Leif Roar Moldskred
<leifm@dimnakorr.com> wrote:
[snip]
>It was the wrong code, but there was nothing wrong _with_ the code:
>like a traffic cop trying to measure the speed of a passing car with a
>hair dryer -- there's nothing wrong _with_ the hair dryer, but the
>hair dryer is clearly the wrong choice.
Sure there was. It had an assumption about how much oomph the
rocket had. The Ariane 5 had way more than the 4 did. With the 4,
the overflow was not possible. With the 5, it was.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
in praise of type checking Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-05 23:33 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-10-06 06:43 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-10-06 09:52 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-07 12:43 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-10-07 14:57 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-10-07 20:18 -0400
Re: in praise of type checking Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-06 22:31 +0200
Re: in praise of type checking Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-07 12:36 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-08 16:05 +0200
Re: in praise of type checking Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-10-08 09:35 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-11 07:48 +0200
Re: in praise of type checking Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-10-11 13:04 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-10-11 17:52 -0300
Re: in praise of type checking Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-10-12 01:49 +0100
Re: in praise of type checking Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-10-11 19:12 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-10-11 19:10 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-10-06 20:29 -0400
Re: in praise of type checking Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-06 23:56 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Gunter Herrmann <notformail0106@earthlink.net> - 2011-10-07 13:57 -0400
Re: in praise of type checking Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-10-07 07:19 -0300
Re: in praise of type checking Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-07 12:39 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-10-07 15:03 -0700
Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-10-11 19:26 +0100
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-10-12 01:15 -0500
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Travers Naran <tnaran@gmail.com> - 2011-10-12 07:23 -0700
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-10-12 20:04 +0000
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-10-12 13:53 -0700
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-10-12 16:55 -0500
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-10-12 15:02 -0700
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-10-13 00:08 -0500
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-10-13 07:48 -0300
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-10-14 07:09 -0400
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-10-12 22:03 +0000
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-10-14 14:14 +0100
Re: in praise of type checking RedGrittyBrick <RedGrittyBrick@spamweary.invalid> - 2011-10-07 11:50 +0100
Re: in praise of [loosey goosey] type checking) RedGrittyBrick <RedGrittyBrick@spamweary.invalid> - 2011-10-07 12:20 +0100
Re: in praise of type checking Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-10-07 14:00 +0000
csiph-web