Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #8712
| From | Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking |
| Date | 2011-10-11 19:26 +0100 |
| Organization | Stack Usenet News Service |
| Message-ID | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1110111908130.2814@urchin.earth.li> (permalink) |
| References | <noiq87l3l9umnl3a74u5jd2c0pnlq21dat@4ax.com> <VmAjq.1736$kJ5.902@newsfe03.iad> <c7lu87lm24pmga3rul1am7s0oju6n26p75@4ax.com> <kftu87hmff3ubjti9t8eims2idhqn58l9o@4ax.com> |
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011, Gene Wirchenko wrote: > I like what Hoare said about it: "The story of the Mariner space > rocket to Venus, lost because of the lack of compulsory declarations in > FORTRAN, was not to be published until later. I love Tony Hoare. But anyway, it occurred to me that there are a remarkable number of good stories about space probes, and space rockets, which are specifically relevant to getting things right (or rather, wrong) when programming. The ones i know: - Mariner 1 and "The most expensive hyphen in history" - Mars Climate Orbiter and metric vs imperial units - Ariane 5 and exception handling, data typing, scope creep, and unit testing - Eagle and the 1201 alarms [1] - I vaguely remember a story about a computer controlling a landing (during a test) which followed a descent trajectory defined by interpolating a polynomial; the points defining the polynomial made a nice smooth line, but the thing about high-order polynomials is that the interpolation between them can be pretty wild - in this case, the minimum altitude reached by the curve was below ground level - Er ... - That's it. Any others? tom [1] On which subject: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/a11.1201-pa.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/a11.1201-fm.html http://www.doneyles.com/LM/Tales.html -- NOW ALL ASS-KICKING UNTIL THE END
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
in praise of type checking Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-05 23:33 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-10-06 06:43 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-10-06 09:52 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-07 12:43 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-10-07 14:57 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-10-07 20:18 -0400
Re: in praise of type checking Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-06 22:31 +0200
Re: in praise of type checking Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-07 12:36 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-08 16:05 +0200
Re: in praise of type checking Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-10-08 09:35 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-11 07:48 +0200
Re: in praise of type checking Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-10-11 13:04 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-10-11 17:52 -0300
Re: in praise of type checking Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-10-12 01:49 +0100
Re: in praise of type checking Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-10-11 19:12 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-10-11 19:10 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-10-06 20:29 -0400
Re: in praise of type checking Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-06 23:56 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Gunter Herrmann <notformail0106@earthlink.net> - 2011-10-07 13:57 -0400
Re: in praise of type checking Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-10-07 07:19 -0300
Re: in praise of type checking Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-07 12:39 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-10-07 15:03 -0700
Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-10-11 19:26 +0100
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-10-12 01:15 -0500
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Travers Naran <tnaran@gmail.com> - 2011-10-12 07:23 -0700
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-10-12 20:04 +0000
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-10-12 13:53 -0700
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-10-12 16:55 -0500
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-10-12 15:02 -0700
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-10-13 00:08 -0500
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-10-13 07:48 -0300
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-10-14 07:09 -0400
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-10-12 22:03 +0000
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-10-14 14:14 +0100
Re: in praise of type checking RedGrittyBrick <RedGrittyBrick@spamweary.invalid> - 2011-10-07 11:50 +0100
Re: in praise of [loosey goosey] type checking) RedGrittyBrick <RedGrittyBrick@spamweary.invalid> - 2011-10-07 12:20 +0100
Re: in praise of type checking Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-10-07 14:00 +0000
csiph-web