Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #21911

Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API

X-Received by 10.224.190.193 with SMTP id dj1mr3845049qab.6.1359609096093; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:11:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Received by 10.49.81.72 with SMTP id y8mr742120qex.42.1359609096007; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:11:36 -0800 (PST)
Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!p13no7285700qai.0!news-out.google.com!k2ni4274qap.0!nntp.google.com!p13no9023279qai.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Date Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:11:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To <5109da3d$0$294$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
Complaints-To groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=217.172.23.24; posting-account=Z-5a_wkAAABTzN1pAiC7xNW_xfTNp2Vr
NNTP-Posting-Host 217.172.23.24
References <0cfefb99-94f9-44e0-9b58-926818a9560d@googlegroups.com> <3srNs.105645$EO2.76867@newsfe04.iad> <dc186206-fd10-47b1-906f-b61eeaee77a9@googlegroups.com> <9fb16fc4-def9-4dba-9076-9d7dba10894e@googlegroups.com> <d61beb09-e24e-4ae2-92dc-bdd502123859@googlegroups.com> <N-qdncuyTf4ug5XMnZ2dnUVZ8g-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <fe4bc896-5b6e-4d4f-a32c-7109d8fcab70@googlegroups.com> <5108747b$0$293$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <3e90248c-5647-4099-b848-c0b1fc8745ab@googlegroups.com> <5109da3d$0$294$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
User-Agent G2/1.0
MIME-Version 1.0
Message-ID <f2dc0ae2-0576-4cc1-8360-0584fdd58d7f@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API
From Mikhail Vladimirov <vladimirow@mail.ru>
Injection-Date Thu, 31 Jan 2013 05:11:36 +0000
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:21911

Show key headers only | View raw

On Thursday, January 31, 2013 6:43:03 AM UTC+4, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> But did you measure if it actually does result in a significant
> difference in performance?
> 
> If not then the performance argument is a bit thin.
Ultralog is not supposed to be faster logger.  It supposed to be garbage-free and lock-free logger.  If one is developing garbage-free application, he or she has to use garbage-free logger, even if it is slower that mainstream one.  If one is developing lock-free application, lock-free logger is needed.

Though, performance tests I did show that ultralog is at least not slower than log4j which is de facto standard mainstream logging framework.

On Thursday, January 31, 2013 6:43:03 AM UTC+4, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> But that raises the question: why did that logger fail to achieve
> traction?
Maybe it didn't fail.  Maybe it failed because people was not ready to sacrifice code readability for performance and use home-grown solutions instead.  Who knows?

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

ultralog: new concept of logging API Mikhail Vladimirov <vladimirow@mail.ru> - 2013-01-26 22:05 -0800
  Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-01-27 10:39 -0800
    Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API vladimirow@mail.ru - 2013-01-27 11:03 -0800
      Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2013-01-27 20:48 +0100
        Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Mikhail Vladimirov <vladimirow@mail.ru> - 2013-01-27 20:15 -0800
      Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2013-01-27 13:51 -0600
        Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Mikhail Vladimirov <vladimirow@mail.ru> - 2013-01-27 19:57 -0800
  Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-01-28 05:23 -0400
    Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Mikhail Vladimirov <vladimirow@mail.ru> - 2013-01-28 01:32 -0800
      Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-01-28 05:37 -0400
        Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Mikhail Vladimirov <vladimirow@mail.ru> - 2013-01-28 02:06 -0800
      Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-28 13:49 -0800
        Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Mikhail Vladimirov <vladimirow@mail.ru> - 2013-01-29 06:04 -0800
          Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-29 10:19 -0800
          Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2013-01-29 13:10 -0600
            Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Mikhail Vladimirov <vladimirow@mail.ru> - 2013-01-29 11:34 -0800
              Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-29 20:16 -0500
                Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Mikhail Vladimirov <vladimirow@mail.ru> - 2013-01-29 19:57 -0800
                Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-29 22:56 -0800
                Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Mikhail Vladimirov <vladimirow@mail.ru> - 2013-01-29 23:19 -0800
                Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-30 08:23 -0800
                Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-01-30 16:54 +0000
                Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Mikhail Vladimirov <vladimirow@mail.ru> - 2013-01-30 13:33 -0800
                Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API tisue@cs.nwu.edu (Seth Tisue) - 2013-01-30 16:37 -0500
                Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API tisue@cs.nwu.edu (Seth Tisue) - 2013-01-30 16:33 -0500
                Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-30 21:50 -0500
                Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-01-31 10:38 +0000
                Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API T®oll <spooksRus@derbyshire-crania.org> - 2013-01-31 12:30 -0500
                Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API T®oll <spooksRus@derbyshire-crania.org> - 2013-01-31 12:30 -0500
                Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-01-31 17:55 +0000
                Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-01-31 10:48 +0000
                Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API T®oll <spooksRus@derbyshire-crania.org> - 2013-01-31 12:32 -0500
                Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-01-31 17:58 +0000
                Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Mikhail Vladimirov <vladimirow@mail.ru> - 2013-01-31 21:49 -0800
                Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-30 21:47 -0500
                Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Mikhail Vladimirov <vladimirow@mail.ru> - 2013-01-30 21:14 -0800
                Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-30 21:43 -0500
                Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Mikhail Vladimirov <vladimirow@mail.ru> - 2013-01-30 21:11 -0800
  Re: ultralog: new concept of logging API Mikhail Vladimirov <vladimirow@mail.ru> - 2013-01-30 13:43 -0800

csiph-web