Received: by 10.68.224.71 with SMTP id ra7mr485680pbc.3.1346263263064; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:01:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.135.103 with SMTP id pr7mr530150pbb.7.1346263262293; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:01:02 -0700 (PDT) Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!4no26007137pbn.1!news-out.google.com!t10ni109755722pbh.0!nntp.google.com!r4no3208700pbs.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:01:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.28.149.29; posting-account=CP-lKQoAAAAGtB5diOuGlDQk0jIwmH0T NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.28.149.29 References: <15cf029d-e8bc-47de-8b83-44e70247d381@googlegroups.com> <0c7750b2-3c6c-416e-8cfe-2673aee3259b@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: thread vs fork? From: Lew Injection-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:01:03 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:18400 Joshua Cranmer wrote: > Lew wrote: >> The OP explicitly said, "in java [sic]". That clears up that question completely. > > Not necessarily. If he meant the Java framework, I would have expected > him to refer to it as "fork-join" instead of as just plain "fork". > People do ask questions in this newsgroup all the time without naming > things reliably. :-) You raise a good point. I suppose I put too much faith in the wording. -- Lew