Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25490

Re: Why “new”?

From	Lew <lew@lewscanon.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Why “new”?
Date	2011-02-09 11:31 -0800
Organization	http://groups.google.com
Message-ID	<ea6f0780-e3e4-43fd-8af3-6028f50e3b22@n2g2000pre.googlegroups.com> (permalink)
References	(15 earlier) <4d521319$0$23758$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <slrnil53lk.nej.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <iiu4br$1q1$1@news.albasani.net> <slrnil5br5.nej.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <e7a1a5dc-dda1-496c-8fa4-d7431b646d3c@i39g2000prd.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Oh, I see my mistake.  I was talking aobut the time he took to google,
and y'all were talking about how long it took him to get an answer on
Usenet.  Since I was reading the thread I can answer that question.
He got an answer within hours of asking.  He then spent days
complaining about the answer.  He seems to have ignored the fact that
the answer he got was complete and informative.  But then, he is a
freaking troll.

Still, my googling of the troll's question (which included his name)
did not reveal how long it took to get his answer, at least not
directly and not within the first page or so.  It did show that he
asked, so I was wrong to say the question isn't amenable to googling,
but that's because I was trying to google how long it took him to
google the answer, not how long it took in Usenet.  My mistake.

--
Lew

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next | Find similar

Thread

Re: Why “new”? Lew <lew@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-09 11:31 -0800

csiph-web