Path: csiph.com!eeepc.pasdenom.info!news.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!74.125.46.80.MISMATCH!postnews.google.com!n2g2000pre.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Lew Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: =?windows-1252?B?UmU6IFdoeSCTbmV3lD8=?= Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 11:31:07 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <4d4e29fb$1@news.x-privat.org> <4d4f6434$1@news.x-privat.org> <4d4f6ae3$1@news.x-privat.org> <4d4f7823$1@news.x-privat.org> <4d50885f$0$23758$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <4d512220@news.x-privat.org> <4d515dba$1@news.x-privat.org> <4d521319$0$23758$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.215.87.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1297279868 3063 127.0.0.1 (9 Feb 2011 19:31:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 19:31:08 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: n2g2000pre.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.215.87.3; posting-account=IZs2IgoAAACGaj2oD74Zp9JDhkUk-os6 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; MS-RTC LM 8),gzip(gfe) Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:25490 Oh, I see my mistake. I was talking aobut the time he took to google, and y'all were talking about how long it took him to get an answer on Usenet. Since I was reading the thread I can answer that question. He got an answer within hours of asking. He then spent days complaining about the answer. He seems to have ignored the fact that the answer he got was complete and informative. But then, he is a freaking troll. Still, my googling of the troll's question (which included his name) did not reveal how long it took to get his answer, at least not directly and not within the first page or so. It did show that he asked, so I was wrong to say the question isn't amenable to googling, but that's because I was trying to google how long it took him to google the answer, not how long it took in Usenet. My mistake. -- Lew