Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #7136

Re: Singleton Pattern

X-FeedAbuse http://nntpfeed.proxad.net/abuse.pl feeded by 88.191.16.109
Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!nospam.fr.eu.org!usenet-fr.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!news.glorb.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:25:22 -0500
Date Tue, 16 Aug 2011 09:25:20 -0700
From Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org>
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version 1.0
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Singleton Pattern
References <3be6e6cf-fa32-4503-9457-b0a1caef8f29@w11g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> <vt-dnf5wc8CJkdrTnZ2dnUVZ_jKdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> <j2b8q2$6pq$1@dont-email.me> <d490d89a-2e63-4099-9629-c275f2cf9847@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> <4o6dnfZWI_mOZtTTnZ2dnUVZ_oqdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <l4udnXOiVIQ2itfTnZ2dnUVZ_uKdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> <mpqdnaDwH__n8NfTnZ2dnUVZ_q6dnZ2d@earthlink.com> <IbydnYJTAt_Y6tfTnZ2dnUVZ_vWdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition>
In-Reply-To <IbydnYJTAt_Y6tfTnZ2dnUVZ_vWdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Message-ID <d7ednWTTv8BvBNfTnZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@earthlink.com> (permalink)
Lines 26
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host 70.230.203.65
X-Trace sv3-HKXO/bGQIPMklbMlzjPhMYRdr5KpVS00DEH9ZR6KgssOmdQm+CJk8P2MjoMUZdsUmyxWaTUV7ZBoi3v!0TgJqW+aTjRjtdtjx+T6QDrFTuivocm3XJyiSwlZpmEgMvdqkDZf2Ydtr5sgTfyc6tX9B59/BHzr!eTWtnaygaEq7H8TYjhYlOAly0o1M8XIFon3fjvoV3xchuQ==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 2808
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:7136

Show key headers only | View raw


On 8/16/2011 6:57 AM, Peter Duniho wrote:
...
> Or looked at another way: if someone has messed up the class design such
> that a singleton class is used even though the singleton instance is
> never actually needed, I'm not sure I trust that person to correctly
> implement even the basic explicit singleton initialization
> synchronization code. Even in that case, better to suffer the potential
> performance hit than to allow them to try to get the explicit
> initialization right.
...

I'm not convinced the method synchronization approach is bad from a
performance point of view. I've never seen a getInstance method as a
heavy hitter in a profile. I suspect that almost always the
synchronization will be uncontended.

After all, the method is non-trivial only once per class loader that
loads the class. The rest of the time it is one memory access and one
conditional branch. If the method is being called frequently, the memory
access hits in cache. From the second call on, the conditional branch
always goes the same way, so the processor should predict it correctly
after a few calls, making it very fast.

I do think the static final approach is even simpler.

Patricia

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Singleton Pattern "vbhavsar@gmail.com" <vbhavsar@gmail.com> - 2011-08-13 13:56 -0700
  Re: Singleton Pattern markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-13 14:41 -0700
  Re: Singleton Pattern Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-13 14:48 -0700
  Re: Singleton Pattern Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-08-13 16:43 -0700
    Re: Singleton Pattern Ian <m4r35n357@gmail.com> - 2011-08-15 15:00 +0100
      Re: Singleton Pattern Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-15 07:56 -0700
        Re: Singleton Pattern Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-15 22:07 -0700
          Re: Singleton Pattern Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-08-16 00:09 -0700
            Re: Singleton Pattern Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-16 06:15 -0700
              Re: Singleton Pattern Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-08-16 06:57 -0700
                Re: Singleton Pattern Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-16 09:25 -0700
                Re: Singleton Pattern Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-08-16 18:10 -0700
  Re: Singleton Pattern Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-08-13 20:56 -0400
    Re: Singleton Pattern Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-13 21:12 -0700
  Re: Singleton Pattern Rajeev <rajeev.nospam@gmail.com> - 2011-08-14 06:37 -0700

csiph-web