Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #7092
| From | markspace <-@.> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Singleton Pattern |
| Date | 2011-08-13 14:41 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <j26r3d$nb8$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <3be6e6cf-fa32-4503-9457-b0a1caef8f29@w11g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> |
On 8/13/2011 1:56 PM, vbhavsar@gmail.com wrote:
> The synchronized createInstance() method would eliminate the need to
> do double-checked locking
Nope, it's worse than standard double checked field and therefore
broken. Checking once outside of a synchronization block doesn't do
anything, it's still a read of an unsynchronized field.
That's why singleton patterns are often complicated, they're trying to
do something difficult.
See the comments I added to your snippet below.
> public static Singleton getInstance(){
> if (_instance == null){ // unsafe check
> createInstance();
> }
> return _instance;
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Singleton Pattern "vbhavsar@gmail.com" <vbhavsar@gmail.com> - 2011-08-13 13:56 -0700
Re: Singleton Pattern markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-13 14:41 -0700
Re: Singleton Pattern Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-13 14:48 -0700
Re: Singleton Pattern Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-08-13 16:43 -0700
Re: Singleton Pattern Ian <m4r35n357@gmail.com> - 2011-08-15 15:00 +0100
Re: Singleton Pattern Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-15 07:56 -0700
Re: Singleton Pattern Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-15 22:07 -0700
Re: Singleton Pattern Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-08-16 00:09 -0700
Re: Singleton Pattern Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-16 06:15 -0700
Re: Singleton Pattern Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-08-16 06:57 -0700
Re: Singleton Pattern Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-16 09:25 -0700
Re: Singleton Pattern Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-08-16 18:10 -0700
Re: Singleton Pattern Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-08-13 20:56 -0400
Re: Singleton Pattern Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-13 21:12 -0700
Re: Singleton Pattern Rajeev <rajeev.nospam@gmail.com> - 2011-08-14 06:37 -0700
csiph-web