Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #9570

Re: particle container in Java

From Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: particle container in Java
Date 2011-11-05 06:42 -0700
Organization Canadian Mind Products
Message-ID <c0eab71ffcvagl7p5ov7t4m7hbai4rl47v@4ax.com> (permalink)
References <17fed3e9-15e0-466c-bb24-10e74633ea1b@t8g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <hlb5b7pfb0kanf6knl8l813gjr8m4q6ckt@4ax.com> <j8uutg$dhb$1@news.albasani.net> <89r8b7964oa0l75o7cvgh06r53l3f4t96d@4ax.com> <j92868$df4$1@news.albasani.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 19:48:12 -0700, BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> wrote,
quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :

>so, like a chain-hash?...
there is no hashing in the sense that HashMap does. In hanging moss,
you select the grid cell by dividing x and y by the x and y grid
resolution giving two ints to index into an array of chains.

It is a similar concept to a HashMap.  HashMap categories elements of
its big set into subcategories that it can linearly seach.  I do the
same thing, except instead of hashing, I divide to home in on the
subcategory.

It has the same problem as your oct-tree in that you need a bounding
box to start.

I have added some comments to the entry at
http://mindprod.com/jgloss/hangingmoss.html


-- 
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
http://mindprod.com
Capitalism has spurred the competition that makes CPUs faster and 
faster each year, but the focus on money makes software manufacturers 
do some peculiar things like deliberately leaving bugs and deficiencies
in the software so they can soak the customers for upgrades later.
Whether software is easy to use, or never loses data, when the company
has a near monopoly, is almost irrelevant to profits, and therefore 
ignored. The manufacturer focuses on cheap gimicks like dancing paper 
clips to dazzle naive first-time buyers. The needs of existing 
experienced users are almost irrelevant. I see software rental as the 
best remedy.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

particle container in Java bob <bob@coolgroups.com> - 2011-11-03 01:05 -0700
  Re: particle container in Java Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-11-03 08:33 +0000
  Re: particle container in Java Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-03 08:12 -0700
    Re: particle container in Java BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-03 13:51 -0700
      Re: particle container in Java Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-04 15:54 -0700
        Re: particle container in Java BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-04 19:48 -0700
          Re: particle container in Java Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-05 06:42 -0700
  Re: particle container in Java Giovanni Azua <bravegag@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-03 23:38 +0100
    Re: particle container in Java BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-03 22:41 -0700
      Re: particle container in Java Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-05 06:49 -0700
        Re: particle container in Java BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-05 09:16 -0700
          Re: particle container in Java Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-06 03:07 -0800
            Re: particle container in Java Giovanni Azua <bravegag@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-06 15:15 +0100
              Re: particle container in Java BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-06 11:06 -0700
  Re: particle container in Java Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-03 19:03 -0400

csiph-web