Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #14993
| Path | csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Slightly off-topic: Determining the strength of "Hangman" word. |
| Date | Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:46:11 -0700 (PDT) |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Lines | 10 |
| Message-ID | <b8a0f059-a981-4701-b66f-9b5dfaaa30ac@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| References | <GYMxr.5280$Bn.3533@newsfe12.iad> <stafs7hb4s35rqo8ug3o8rg9dp5n4mleu2@4ax.com> <RQOxr.27960$x11.23008@newsfe21.iad> <q34hs7l2mer6nrmuhvh1e8b0729b8fgfje@4ax.com> <llrhs7ltk8lg5fv8kecnpv4md6v464qfbf@4ax.com> <f64is7h4o6n4n4nn3t8h3devo0p5ho1jb9@4ax.com> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 69.28.149.29 |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| X-Trace | posting.google.com 1338580072 7534 127.0.0.1 (1 Jun 2012 19:47:52 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Fri, 1 Jun 2012 19:47:52 +0000 (UTC) |
| Cc | Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> |
| In-Reply-To | <f64is7h4o6n4n4nn3t8h3devo0p5ho1jb9@4ax.com> |
| Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| Injection-Info | glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.28.149.29; posting-account=CP-lKQoAAAAGtB5diOuGlDQk0jIwmH0T |
| User-Agent | G2/1.0 |
| X-Received-Bytes | 1539 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:14993 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Roedy Green wrote: > I understood the game to allow me to know the list of words in the bag > before I start play. Is that correct? Isn't that true of all word games? Or do I misunderstand what you mean by "in the bag"? -- Lew
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Slightly off-topic: Determining the strength of "Hangman" word. Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-31 09:26 -0700
Re: Slightly off-topic: Determining the strength of "Hangman" word. Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-05-31 09:44 -0700
Re: Slightly off-topic: Determining the strength of "Hangman" word. Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-05-31 10:43 -0700
Re: Slightly off-topic: Determining the strength of "Hangman" word. Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-31 11:34 -0700
Re: Slightly off-topic: Determining the strength of "Hangman" word. Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-06-01 02:55 -0700
Re: Slightly off-topic: Determining the strength of "Hangman" word. Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-06-01 09:34 -0700
Re: Slightly off-topic: Determining the strength of "Hangman" word. Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-06-01 11:58 -0700
Re: Slightly off-topic: Determining the strength of "Hangman" word. Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-06-01 12:46 -0700
Re: Slightly off-topic: Determining the strength of "Hangman" word. Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-06-01 12:45 -0700
Re: Slightly off-topic: Determining the strength of "Hangman" word. Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-06-01 13:46 -0700
csiph-web