Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #14984
| From | Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Slightly off-topic: Determining the strength of "Hangman" word. |
| Date | 2012-06-01 09:34 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <llrhs7ltk8lg5fv8kecnpv4md6v464qfbf@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <GYMxr.5280$Bn.3533@newsfe12.iad> <stafs7hb4s35rqo8ug3o8rg9dp5n4mleu2@4ax.com> <RQOxr.27960$x11.23008@newsfe21.iad> <q34hs7l2mer6nrmuhvh1e8b0729b8fgfje@4ax.com> |
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 02:55:52 -0700, Roedy Green
<see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote:
>On Thu, 31 May 2012 11:34:23 -0700, Daniel Pitts
><newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> wrote, quoted or indirectly
>quoted someone who said :
>
>>The problem is that some words are false positives. They seem ambiguous
>>for the most part, but one letter absolutely gives it away.
>
>This is a messy problem. For every guessing strategy you need a
>different algorithm to determine difficulty. But if you have enough
>algorithms that each say produce a number 0..1 you can take the max as
>the guessability or the sum, or something in between that gives extra
>weight to high components (sum of cubes?)
Suppose someone games your choice of algorithms by choosing words
to give bad results by those algorithms.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Slightly off-topic: Determining the strength of "Hangman" word. Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-31 09:26 -0700
Re: Slightly off-topic: Determining the strength of "Hangman" word. Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-05-31 09:44 -0700
Re: Slightly off-topic: Determining the strength of "Hangman" word. Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-05-31 10:43 -0700
Re: Slightly off-topic: Determining the strength of "Hangman" word. Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-31 11:34 -0700
Re: Slightly off-topic: Determining the strength of "Hangman" word. Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-06-01 02:55 -0700
Re: Slightly off-topic: Determining the strength of "Hangman" word. Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-06-01 09:34 -0700
Re: Slightly off-topic: Determining the strength of "Hangman" word. Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-06-01 11:58 -0700
Re: Slightly off-topic: Determining the strength of "Hangman" word. Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-06-01 12:46 -0700
Re: Slightly off-topic: Determining the strength of "Hangman" word. Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-06-01 12:45 -0700
Re: Slightly off-topic: Determining the strength of "Hangman" word. Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-06-01 13:46 -0700
csiph-web