Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #3038
| From | Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Novice to Generics Trying to Implement a Generic Priority Queue |
| Date | 2011-04-11 22:41 +0100 |
| Organization | Stack Usenet News Service |
| Message-ID | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1104112240430.2081@urchin.earth.li> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <jbl0q6p0rcaa3olndpqe7r10qtij1joatt@4ax.com> <25ad9459-6d49-4f16-8eb9-d40bec3fc2e2@p13g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <generic-array-20110411195050@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <138ac7bc-69e3-458b-a49f-881ac1a7bfa5@k11g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <invlj0$ibd$1@dont-email.me> |
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Daniele Futtorovic wrote:
> On 11/04/2011 21:10, KevinSimonson allegedly wrote:
>> On Apr 11, 11:52 am, r...@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) wrote:
>>> KevinSimonson<kvnsm...@hotmail.com> writes:
>>>> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassCastException:
>>>> [Ljava.lang.Object; cannot be cast to [Ljava.lang.Comparable;
>>>
>>> ( Da[] )new java.lang.Comparable[ size ]
>>
>> Stefan, thanks! That solved the problem and my program works just
>> fine now.
>
> This might be somewhat OK in this case, but it's hardly advisable.
>
> A Comparable[] /is not a/ Da[].
>
> You'd normally pass the Class object around in such cases:
>
> public PriorityQueue( Class<Da> component, int size )
> throws BadSizeException
> {
> if (0<= size)
> { queue = (Da[]) Array.newInstance( component, size );
I'm not sure about 'normally'. That is certainly a known technique (for
those who haven't seen it, this use of a Class is called a 'type token'),
and whilst it may be advisable, i don't think it's more common than making
an array of some suitable static type and casting it uncheckedly [sic].
Does the JDK use it anywhere?
tom
--
Taking care of business
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Novice to Generics Trying to Implement a Generic Priority Queue KevinSimonson <kvnsmnsn@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-07 16:03 -0700
Re: Novice to Generics Trying to Implement a Generic Priority Queue markspace <-@.> - 2011-04-07 17:32 -0700
Re: Novice to Generics Trying to Implement a Generic Priority Queue KevinSimonson <kvnsmnsn@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-08 14:55 -0700
Re: Novice to Generics Trying to Implement a Generic Priority Queue markspace <-@.> - 2011-04-08 15:54 -0700
Re: Novice to Generics Trying to Implement a Generic Priority Queue Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-08 20:39 -0400
Re: Novice to Generics Trying to Implement a Generic Priority Queue Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-09 10:36 +0100
Re: Novice to Generics Trying to Implement a Generic Priority Queue Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-04-09 05:50 -0700
Re: Novice to Generics Trying to Implement a Generic Priority Queue KevinSimonson <kvnsmnsn@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-11 08:08 -0700
Re: Novice to Generics Trying to Implement a Generic Priority Queue markspace <-@.> - 2011-04-11 10:29 -0700
Re: Novice to Generics Trying to Implement a Generic Priority Queue KevinSimonson <kvnsmnsn@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-11 12:10 -0700
Re: Novice to Generics Trying to Implement a Generic Priority Queue Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-04-11 21:42 +0200
Re: Novice to Generics Trying to Implement a Generic Priority Queue Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-11 22:41 +0100
Re: Novice to Generics Trying to Implement a Generic Priority Queue Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-04-12 01:07 +0200
csiph-web