Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #20872
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-02 09:46 -0800 |
| References | <c885bedb-977c-49b4-a10a-b9cdd3df1dd9@googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <ac485316-8e79-4e92-b81a-21b6189cb6c6@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? |
| From | Saxo <jeti789@web.de> |
Hm... Maybe it was done that way for backwards compatibility. JDK8 lambdas are like less verbose annonymous classes and nothing more ...
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? jeti789@web.de - 2013-01-02 04:51 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-01-02 14:15 +0000
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2013-01-07 23:08 +0100
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2013-01-02 09:46 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2013-01-05 07:01 -0800
csiph-web