Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #20872
| X-Received | by 10.224.198.196 with SMTP id ep4mr22250744qab.3.1357148768411; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:46:08 -0800 (PST) |
|---|---|
| Received | by 10.49.116.139 with SMTP id jw11mr7338037qeb.12.1357148768347; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:46:08 -0800 (PST) |
| Path | csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news1.as3257.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.216.88.MISMATCH!ee4no11986215qab.0!news-out.google.com!k2ni4226qap.0!nntp.google.com!ee4no11986205qab.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Date | Wed, 2 Jan 2013 09:46:08 -0800 (PST) |
| In-Reply-To | <c885bedb-977c-49b4-a10a-b9cdd3df1dd9@googlegroups.com> |
| Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| Injection-Info | glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=95.116.88.210; posting-account=QuOrbQoAAADk1Ytmd4kkfWK7_Nh1pnw_ |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 95.116.88.210 |
| References | <c885bedb-977c-49b4-a10a-b9cdd3df1dd9@googlegroups.com> |
| User-Agent | G2/1.0 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Message-ID | <ac485316-8e79-4e92-b81a-21b6189cb6c6@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? |
| From | Saxo <jeti789@web.de> |
| Injection-Date | Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:46:08 +0000 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:20872 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Hm... Maybe it was done that way for backwards compatibility. JDK8 lambdas are like less verbose annonymous classes and nothing more ...
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? jeti789@web.de - 2013-01-02 04:51 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-01-02 14:15 +0000
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2013-01-07 23:08 +0100
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2013-01-02 09:46 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2013-01-05 07:01 -0800
csiph-web