Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #18527
| From | Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Wormholes |
| Date | 2012-09-04 07:08 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <aalgn0F7ffU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <0ska4895k2mp2j5fb5p4qnue7lsbdpoeoo@4ax.com> <k23ud8$tr5$1@dont-email.me> |
On 04.09.2012 06:00, markspace wrote: > On 9/3/2012 6:12 PM, Roedy Green wrote: >> I run into this sort of problem fairly often. That sounds like a warning sign for the way you structure code. >> I have a method x that calls method y through a long chain of >> intermediate calls. > I'm thinking that if your methods have to pass data through a long chain > of calls, then the code is badly structured period. You might as well > use the opportunity to refactor rather than trying to invent a "wormhole." If there are public library methods involved the situation is much worse: then Roedy probably cannot refactor but has to add functionality... > I can think of at least one way to implement a wormhole. I'm just not > going to go there because it's a terrible idea. I am pretty confident I know what you mean. I would even go as far as to calling usage of that "opening a can of worms". There are also negative side effects on testability... Kind regards robert -- remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Wormholes Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-09-03 18:12 -0700
Re: Wormholes eric@invalid.com (EricF) - 2012-09-04 02:06 +0000
Re: Wormholes Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-09-04 10:08 -0700
Re: Wormholes Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2012-09-09 13:55 +0200
Re: Wormholes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-03 22:34 -0400
Re: Wormholes Stuart <DerTopper@web.de> - 2012-09-04 12:15 +0200
Re: Wormholes markspace <-@.> - 2012-09-03 21:00 -0700
Re: Wormholes Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-04 07:08 +0200
Re: Wormholes Zermelo <zermelo@teletu.it.nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-04 08:47 +0200
Re: Wormholes Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-09-04 03:10 -0700
Re: Wormholes Zermelo <zermelo@teletu.it.nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-04 16:09 +0200
Re: Wormholes Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-09-04 08:34 -0700
Re: Wormholes Zermelo <zermelo@teletu.it.nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-04 17:46 +0200
Re: Wormholes Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-09-04 09:31 -0700
Re: Wormholes Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-09-04 11:14 -0700
Re: Wormholes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-04 19:59 -0400
Re: Wormholes Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-09-04 13:20 -0700
Re: Wormholes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-04 20:00 -0400
Re: Wormholes Zermelo <zermelo@teletu.it.nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-05 09:01 +0200
Re: Wormholes Zermelo <zermelo@teletu.it.nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-05 09:02 +0200
Re: Wormholes Zermelo <zermelo@teletu.it.nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-05 09:02 +0200
Re: Wormholes Zermelo <zermelo@teletu.it.nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-05 09:03 +0200
Re: Wormholes markspace <-@.> - 2012-09-05 17:34 -0700
Re: Wormholes Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2012-09-04 14:18 +0100
Re: Wormholes Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-05 21:51 +0200
Re: Wormholes Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2012-09-05 23:26 +0100
Re: Wormholes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2012-09-06 09:32 +0000
Re: Wormholes Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2012-09-06 11:47 +0100
Re: Wormholes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2012-09-06 15:10 +0000
Re: Wormholes Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2012-09-06 20:12 +0100
Re: Wormholes Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2012-09-06 21:08 +0000
Re: Wormholes Nigel Wade <nmw@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2012-09-04 17:26 +0100
Re: Wormholes Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-09-04 09:28 -0700
Re: Wormholes David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2012-09-04 16:54 -0400
csiph-web