Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #9719
| Date | 2011-11-06 17:35 -0800 |
|---|---|
| From | Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream |
| References | (2 earlier) <19587162.2005.1317743300210.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prfh23> <bpGdnWtFWejMshbTnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> <4eb716f1$0$283$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <hoidnTzMrYOovSrTnZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> <4eb72a48$0$285$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
| Message-ID | <WdedncesRr1iqCrTnZ2dnUVZ_rSdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> (permalink) |
On 11/6/11 4:46 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: > On 11/6/2011 7:03 PM, Peter Duniho wrote: >> On 11/6/11 3:23 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: >>> [...] >>> It seems rather obvious to me that a new BufferedInputStream >>> would be created every time this code is called. >> >> Really? You resurrected a thread that's over a month old, just to tell >> us what's obvious to you? > > It seemed relevant to point out that the guy that provided > that solution was not guessing [...] Sure he was. It was a good guess. But still a guess. Since the code that was posted was useless on its own, it's obvious that code was not the code the OP actually was using. Once we know the code posted isn't the code actually being used, it's impossible to say for sure what the code actually being used really looks like. Maybe it was, as the posted code did, creating a new object each time. Maybe it wasn't. You can ASSume it was if you like, but some of us prefer to stick with what we actually _know_. Pete
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-10-04 01:58 +1100
Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-10-04 02:26 +1100
Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream Ronny Schütz <usenet.r96@gishpuppy.com> - 2011-10-03 17:54 +0200
Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-10-04 07:07 +1100
Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-10-03 13:18 -0700
Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-10-04 10:54 +1100
Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-03 11:46 -0700
Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-11-07 11:00 +0100
Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-10-03 08:44 -0700
Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream markspace <-@.> - 2011-10-03 11:33 -0700
Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-10-04 08:48 -0700
Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-10-04 09:07 -0700
Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-10-04 12:06 -0700
Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-06 18:23 -0500
Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-11-06 16:03 -0800
Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-06 19:46 -0500
Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-11-06 17:35 -0800
Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-06 21:16 -0500
Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-11-06 18:30 -0800
Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-06 21:50 -0500
csiph-web