Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #8542

Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream

From Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream
Date 2011-10-04 12:06 -0700
Organization http://groups.google.com
Message-ID <73981.2133.1317755196942.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prfh23> (permalink)
References <y4Cdne-uvN4kUBTTnZ2dnUVZ_hWdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <j6cv50$2fk$2@dont-email.me> <19587162.2005.1317743300210.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prfh23> <bpGdnWtFWejMshbTnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition>

Show all headers | View raw


Peter Duniho wrote:
> Lew wrote:
>> Just this once the question was answerable (and answered, elsethread) without the SSCCE [...]
> 
> By that standard, _all_ questions are answerable without an SSCCE.  A 
> person attempting an answer can always make a guess, and that guess 
> always has a non-zero probability of being correct.

You're preaching to the choir!

I did point out that the omission only worked "just this once", not recommend it.

And as you point out, the score is less than one for one.

> It was not possible from the code posted to _know_ that the OP was 
> actually recreating the BufferedInputStream anew each time.  One could 
> certainly guess, and of course Ronny did (and did so correctly, as it 
> turns out).
> 
> But without an SSCCE, we know that the code posted deviates from the 
> _actual_ code in some way, and it could just as easily have been that 
> part of the deviation included an oversimplification of how 
> BufferedInputStream was used.
> 
> Other guesses were made as well (i.e. my own), based on the same 
> incomplete information, and they were wrong.  The guess that 
> BufferedInputStream was being recreated each time could have been wrong 
> too, since the code posted was obviously not really the code the OP was 
> using.
> 
> That guess turned out to be right, and I give all credit to Ronny for 
> taking the code at face value and making the guess he did.  He succeeded 
> where at least some of the rest of us failed.  But there was no 
> assurance at all that would have happened (*)
> 
> An SSCCE isn't just a good idea; it's a practical requirement.

Amen, brother!

-- 
Lew

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-10-04 01:58 +1100
  Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-10-04 02:26 +1100
    Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream Ronny Schütz <usenet.r96@gishpuppy.com> - 2011-10-03 17:54 +0200
      Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-10-04 07:07 +1100
        Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-10-03 13:18 -0700
      Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-10-04 10:54 +1100
    Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-03 11:46 -0700
  Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-10-03 08:44 -0700
  Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream markspace <-@.> - 2011-10-03 11:33 -0700
    Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-10-04 08:48 -0700
      Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-10-04 09:07 -0700
        Re: Buffered reading seems to corrupt data stream Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-10-04 12:06 -0700

csiph-web