Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25501

Re: Why “new”?

Date 2011-02-09 01:07 +0800
From Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Why “new”?
References (12 earlier) <4d4faac2$1@news.x-privat.org> <cvudnU5knePxMtLQnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> <4d512649@news.x-privat.org> <j6ednZsSg85zqMzQnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> <4d51600d$1@news.x-privat.org>
Message-ID <W5ydnc3s8Y385czQnZ2dnUVZ_rgAAAAA@posted.palinacquisition> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 2/8/11 11:23 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 20:24:13 +0800, Peter Duniho wrote:
>
>> On 2/8/11 7:17 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Sure I could have tried mucking about with assorted google queries. I
>>> just plain didn't feel like it. Satisfied?
>>
>> Yes.  That's all I wanted: your admission, even absent an apology, that
>> you were lazy.
>
> But you didn't get it. I don't agree that it is "lazy" to ask someone
> instead of googling.

Doesn't really matter whether you agree.  You admitted to behavior 
anyone else would describe as lazy.

> What do you usually do if you're talking to someone

How is that relevant here?  We are not in a direct, face-to-face 
conversation.  It's a completely different type of interaction, one in 
which it's not only socially acceptable for you to remove yourself from 
the discussion momentarily in order to look something up, it's _expected_.

> [...]
> Furthermore, consider what happens if a number of people read a post and,
> say, wonder what J is.

You are more than welcome to, instead of _asking_ what J is, follow-up 
with a post that _explains_ what J is.  No one is stopping you from 
that, any more than they are stopping you from asking the lazy question 
in the first place.

Pete

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Why “new”? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-02-09 01:07 +0800
  Re: Why “new”? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-02-09 09:10 +0800
  Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 19:49 +0100

csiph-web