Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #6473

Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux

Show all headers | View raw

On Jul 23, 10:33 am, Arne Vajhøj <a...@vajhoej.dk> wrote:
> On 7/23/2011 12:20 PM, lewbloch wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 23, 8:19 am, Arne Vajh j<a...@vajhoej.dk>  wrote:
> >> On 7/23/2011 9:19 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:35:00 -0700, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>
> >>>> On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:43:10 -0400, Arne Vajh j<a...@vajhoej.dk>    wrote:
>
> >>>>> On 6/27/2011 4:12 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> >>>>>> On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:04:11 -0400, Joshua Cranmer
> >>>>>> <Pidgeo...@verizon.invalid>     wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> On 06/26/2011 11:42 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> >>>>>>>>          Think simple version of the C preprocessor.
>
> >>>>>>> Then why not use the C preprocessor?
>
> >>>>>>         I could not find one that would run standalone on my system.
>
> >>>>> Almost all C compiler has a way to do only preprocessing.
>
> >>>>> GCC, MS, DEC/CPQ/HP etc. has.
>
> >>>>        I did not want a C compiler.  I simply wanted a preprocessor.
>
> >>> The last C compilers I remember that had separate preprocessors were K&R,
> >>> so were very old. In these, cc was effectively a shell that invoked the
> >>> preprocessor, the C -->    assembler translator, the assembler and the
> >>> linker in turn. Actually, I'm still using one - the standard OS/9 v2.4 C
> >>> compiler, which dates from 1992 and runs on 68xxx hardware.
>
> >>> I don't remember any ANSI C compilers I've used being structured this
> >>> way: certainly I've not seen any version of the GNU compiler or its
> >>> derivatives that aren't a monolithic chunk that includes all compilation
> >>> stages except the linker. AFAICR this also applied to the Borland
> >>> compilers.
>
> >>> So, if that's really what you want, go and find a old K&R compiler or its
> >>> source.
>
> >> GCC still has a separate executable for preprocessing!
>
> >> The driver gcc or g++ calls cpp, cc1 or cc1plus, as and ld.
>
> > <http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.1/gcc/Preprocessor-
> > Options.html#Preprocessor-Options>
> > "If you use the -E option, nothing is done except preprocessing. Some
> > of these options make sense only together with -E because they cause
> > the preprocessor output to be unsuitable for actual compilation."
>
> > Ain't the FM (of "RTFM") a marvel? Amazing what one can learn by
> > reading the documentation!
>
> Is is great reading the FM.
>
> In this case the FM (at least not in what you quote) does not cover
> the topic of discussion - whether it is a monolithic executable
> or a series of executables.

A difference that makes no difference is no difference.

--
Lew

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-21 20:43 -0400
  Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-07-22 12:35 -0700
    Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-07-22 13:09 -0700
    Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-22 13:35 -0700
    Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-22 16:53 -0400
    Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-23 13:19 +0000
      Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-23 11:19 -0400
        Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-23 09:20 -0700
          Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-23 13:33 -0400
            Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-23 11:43 -0700
              Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-23 12:14 -0700
                Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-23 19:19 -0400
              Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-23 19:12 -0400
        Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-23 17:24 +0000
          Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-23 19:22 -0400
            Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-24 10:02 +0000

csiph-web