Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #6486
| Date | 2011-07-23 19:22 -0400 |
|---|---|
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux |
| References | (7 earlier) <4e28c7a0$0$308$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <c5kj27pehob8m91ilr27gq4ndg853j3h56@4ax.com> <j0ehp2$l3l$1@localhost.localdomain> <4e2ae67d$0$303$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <j0f042$p4k$1@localhost.localdomain> |
| Message-ID | <4e2b57ab$0$309$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> (permalink) |
| Organization | SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source |
On 7/23/2011 1:24 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 11:19:19 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote: > >> On 7/23/2011 9:19 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote: > >>> The last C compilers I remember that had separate preprocessors were >>> K&R, so were very old. In these, cc was effectively a shell that >>> invoked the preprocessor, the C --> assembler translator, the >>> assembler and the linker in turn. Actually, I'm still using one - the >>> standard OS/9 v2.4 C compiler, which dates from 1992 and runs on 68xxx >>> hardware. >>> >>> I don't remember any ANSI C compilers I've used being structured this >>> way: certainly I've not seen any version of the GNU compiler or its >>> derivatives that aren't a monolithic chunk that includes all >>> compilation stages except the linker. AFAICR this also applied to the >>> Borland compilers. >>> >>> So, if that's really what you want, go and find a old K&R compiler or >>> its source. >> >> GCC still has a separate executable for preprocessing! >> >> The driver gcc or g++ calls cpp, cc1 or cc1plus, as and ld. >> > Fair cop, guv. > > I looked at /usr/bin, thought the preprocessor was called cpre so didn't > find it and glanced through 'man gcc' but didn't find anything describing > the compiler structure. The fact that the options are subdivided onto > compilation stages doesn't necessarily say anything about the compiler > physical structure, and as gcc is fairly big, I assumed.... It is cpp (or gcc-cpp). Not a very good name - most would assume that cpp=c plus plus. But then most people would call it via the general compiler driver, so it does not matter much. Arne
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-21 20:43 -0400
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-07-22 12:35 -0700
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-07-22 13:09 -0700
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-22 13:35 -0700
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-22 16:53 -0400
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-23 13:19 +0000
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-23 11:19 -0400
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-23 09:20 -0700
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-23 13:33 -0400
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-23 11:43 -0700
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-23 12:14 -0700
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-23 19:19 -0400
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-23 19:12 -0400
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-23 17:24 +0000
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-23 19:22 -0400
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-24 10:02 +0000
csiph-web