Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #6484
| Date | 2011-07-23 19:12 -0400 |
|---|---|
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux |
| References | (9 earlier) <j0ehp2$l3l$1@localhost.localdomain> <4e2ae67d$0$303$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <2aca8f06-1dc8-4fff-b7f1-0e35eea32d2f@f39g2000prb.googlegroups.com> <4e2b05e3$0$310$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <66de694c-382e-473c-a9c3-2c8433bc837c@r5g2000prf.googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <4e2b557d$0$305$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> (permalink) |
| Organization | SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source |
On 7/23/2011 2:43 PM, lewbloch wrote: > On Jul 23, 10:33 am, Arne Vajhøj<a...@vajhoej.dk> wrote: >> On 7/23/2011 12:20 PM, lewbloch wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Jul 23, 8:19 am, Arne Vajh j<a...@vajhoej.dk> wrote: >>>> On 7/23/2011 9:19 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:35:00 -0700, Gene Wirchenko wrote: >> >>>>>> On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:43:10 -0400, Arne Vajh j<a...@vajhoej.dk> wrote: >> >>>>>>> On 6/27/2011 4:12 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote: >>>>>>>> On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:04:11 -0400, Joshua Cranmer >>>>>>>> <Pidgeo...@verizon.invalid> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> On 06/26/2011 11:42 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Think simple version of the C preprocessor. >> >>>>>>>>> Then why not use the C preprocessor? >> >>>>>>>> I could not find one that would run standalone on my system. >> >>>>>>> Almost all C compiler has a way to do only preprocessing. >> >>>>>>> GCC, MS, DEC/CPQ/HP etc. has. >> >>>>>> I did not want a C compiler. I simply wanted a preprocessor. >> >>>>> The last C compilers I remember that had separate preprocessors were K&R, >>>>> so were very old. In these, cc was effectively a shell that invoked the >>>>> preprocessor, the C --> assembler translator, the assembler and the >>>>> linker in turn. Actually, I'm still using one - the standard OS/9 v2.4 C >>>>> compiler, which dates from 1992 and runs on 68xxx hardware. >> >>>>> I don't remember any ANSI C compilers I've used being structured this >>>>> way: certainly I've not seen any version of the GNU compiler or its >>>>> derivatives that aren't a monolithic chunk that includes all compilation >>>>> stages except the linker. AFAICR this also applied to the Borland >>>>> compilers. >> >>>>> So, if that's really what you want, go and find a old K&R compiler or its >>>>> source. >> >>>> GCC still has a separate executable for preprocessing! >> >>>> The driver gcc or g++ calls cpp, cc1 or cc1plus, as and ld. >> >>> <http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.1/gcc/Preprocessor- >>> Options.html#Preprocessor-Options> >>> "If you use the -E option, nothing is done except preprocessing. Some >>> of these options make sense only together with -E because they cause >>> the preprocessor output to be unsuitable for actual compilation." >> >>> Ain't the FM (of "RTFM") a marvel? Amazing what one can learn by >>> reading the documentation! >> >> Is is great reading the FM. >> >> In this case the FM (at least not in what you quote) does not cover >> the topic of discussion - whether it is a monolithic executable >> or a series of executables. > > A difference that makes no difference is no difference. It has no impact on the OP's problem, but there was a little side discussion on the GCC implementation. Arne
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-21 20:43 -0400
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-07-22 12:35 -0700
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-07-22 13:09 -0700
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-22 13:35 -0700
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-22 16:53 -0400
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-23 13:19 +0000
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-23 11:19 -0400
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-23 09:20 -0700
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-23 13:33 -0400
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-23 11:43 -0700
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-23 12:14 -0700
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-23 19:19 -0400
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-23 19:12 -0400
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-23 17:24 +0000
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-23 19:22 -0400
Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-24 10:02 +0000
csiph-web