Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #17806

Re: hashCode

Path	csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!news-out.news.tds.net!newsreading01.news.tds.net!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From	"Arne Vajhøj" <�� høj@1:261/38.remove-nlb-this>
Subject	Re: hashCode
Message-ID	<502943B2.56753.calajapr@time.synchro.net> (permalink)
X-Comment-To	Eric Sosman
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
In-Reply-To	<502943B2.56750.calajapr@time.synchro.net>
References	<502943B2.56750.calajapr@time.synchro.net>
X-FTN-AREA	COMP.LANG.JAVA.PROGRAMMER
X-FTN-MSGID	1:261/38 43da0669
X-FTN-REPLY	1:261/38 f80daf3c
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=IBM437
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Gateway	time.synchro.net [Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98]
Lines	54
Date	Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:36:16 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host	69.21.70.65
X-Complaints-To	news@tds.net
X-Trace	newsreading01.news.tds.net 1344882976 69.21.70.65 (Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:36:16 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date	Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:36:16 CDT
Organization	tds.net
X-Received-Bytes	2809
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:17806

Show key headers only | View raw

  To: Eric Sosman
From: "=?UTF-8?B?QXJuZSBWYWpow7hq?=" <=?utf-8?b?qxjuzsbwywpow7hq?=@1:261/38.rem
ove-m2z-this>

  To: Eric Sosman
From: =?UTF-8?B?QXJuZSBWYWpow7hq?= <arne@vajhoej.dk>

On 8/11/2012 10:43 PM, Eric Sosman wrote:
>      The O.P. asked whether it would "be potentially better" if
> Object's hashCode() returned a constant.  He did *not* ask whether
> such an implementation would be correct; he only asked if it would
> "be potentially better."  Upon prompting he explained what he
> meant by "better," and in light of that explanation the answer
> to his original question is NO.  Discussions about "Oh, but it's
> CORRECT" are just red herrings; it's still not "better."

The original questions were:

#Is it always technically correct to override the hashCode function
#like so:
#
#       @Override
#       public int hashCode() {
#               return 1;
#       }

For which the answer is YES. Per documentation.

But with really poor performance in many relevant cases.

#Would it be potentially better if that was Object's implementation?

Which was clarified to:

#Better in the sense that you would never HAVE to override hashCode.

For which the answer is also YES. Per the previous.

But with the same performance note. And a big sigh because it seems to want to 
broaden bad performance from a single class to the entire programming style 
(multiple classes).

Arne

-+- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
 + Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
-+- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
 * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
--- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: hashCode "Lew" <lew@1:261/38.remove-nlb-this> - 2012-08-13 18:36 +0000
  Re: hashCode "Arne Vajhøj" <������
høj@1:261/38.remove-nlb-this> - 2012-08-13 18:36 +0000
    Re: hashCode "Arne Vajhøj" <������
høj@1:261/38.remove-nlb-this> - 2012-08-13 18:36 +0000
      Re: hashCode "Eric Sosman" <eric.sosman@1:261/38.remove-nlb-this> - 2012-08-13 18:36 +0000
        Re: hashCode "Arne Vajhøj" <������
høj@1:261/38.remove-nlb-this> - 2012-08-13 18:36 +0000

csiph-web