Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #17334
| From | "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-p82-this> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? |
| Message-ID | <5021F863.56288.calajapr@time.synchro.net> (permalink) |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| References | <5012D7B7.55394.calajapr@time.synchro.net> |
| Date | 2012-08-08 06:20 +0000 |
| Organization | tds.net |
To: Patricia Shanahan From: Arne Vajhoj <arne@vajhoej.dk> On 7/27/2012 12:05 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > On 7/26/2012 11:47 AM, Arne Vajhoj wrote: > ... >> Someone believing in most of them is a different story. I am skeptical >> about calling such a person for a Java developer. Even though the code >> is following JLS and compiles with javac, then there is almost no >> overlap with the Java world. It is not the Java way. And if the >> person tried to write such code at work, then the person would be >> kicked out quickly in many places. It is not what companies expect >> when they hire a Java developer. > ... > > I think of programming languages as tools, not philosophies. Java > happens to be a favorite tool, one that fits my brain the way my > favorite wood carving chisel fits my hand. On the other hand, I no more > subscribe to "the Java way" than to a "the half inch chisel way". > > When I'm starting a new program, in a situation in which I'm free to use > any standards I like, I follow the commonest conventions for the > program's language. If I'm modifying or adding to an existing project, > or working in an organization that has other conventions, I follow the > local conventions. So in reality you are subscribing to the Java way. Arne --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1 * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38) --- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98 Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-10ae-this> - 2012-07-27 18:40 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Patricia Shanahan" <patricia.shanahan@1:261/38.remove-10ae-this> - 2012-07-27 18:41 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? jebblue <n@n.nnn> - 2012-07-28 11:32 -0500
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Wanja Gayk" <wanja.gayk@1:261/38.remove-5qr-this> - 2012-08-04 18:41 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Patricia Shanahan" <patricia.shanahan@1:261/38.remove-5qr-this> - 2012-08-04 18:41 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "John B. Matthews" <john.b..matthews@1:261/38.remove-2y0-this> - 2012-08-05 18:42 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-p82-this> - 2012-08-08 06:20 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-p82-this> - 2012-08-08 06:20 +0000
Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Gene Wirchenko" <gene.wirchenko@1:261/38.remove-10ae-this> - 2012-07-27 18:41 +0000
csiph-web