Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #4230

OT: Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!prichard.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date	Tue, 17 May 2011 18:04:28 +0100
From	RedGrittyBrick <RedGrittyBrick@spamweary.invalid>
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version	1.0
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	OT: Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions
References	<2ptyczln7x.fsf@shell.xmission.com> <iqmhbr$7kh$1@dont-email.me> <2pei3zkhw1.fsf@shell.xmission.com> <JMCdnZdUS79lUUzQnZ2dnUVZ_gOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <2pvcx9igb2.fsf@shell.xmission.com> <2pr57xibe6.fsf@shell.xmission.com> <iqu5ku$5tv$1@news.albasani.net>
In-Reply-To	<iqu5ku$5tv$1@news.albasani.net>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
Lines	15
Message-ID	<4dd2aa9d$0$2505$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk> (permalink)
Organization	Zen Internet
NNTP-Posting-Host	f32538d7.news.zen.co.uk
X-Trace	DXC=Z]@@[:5eZ0M:[?_YF6m3FD0g@SS;SF6nGRiiCXJE[K>GILW?eE;2EcOFJPo[XSAIj@6mh>R[8J\2O
X-Complaints-To	abuse@zen.co.uk
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:4230

Show key headers only | View raw

On 17/05/2011 16:53, Lew wrote:
>
> "Plugin" exists in the wild, and is documented by some as an alternate
> spelling. Within a couple of years, I predict, it will be widely
> accepted, just as "resume" is for "résumé" today, and for the same reason.
>
> Loss of the hyphen to become a true compound word is an historically
> frequent occurrence.
>


The day co-operative and coöperative became cooperative, did coopers?

-- 
RGB

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Eclipse spell checker omissions Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-05-12 13:42 -0600
  Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-13 14:44 +1200
  Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2011-05-14 21:23 +0300
    Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-05-15 11:12 -0600
      Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2011-05-16 01:17 +0300
        Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-05-16 08:51 -0600
          Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-16 11:22 -0400
      Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-16 14:25 +1200
        Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-15 22:28 -0400
      Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions jebblue <n@n.nnn> - 2011-05-16 20:18 -0500
        Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-16 21:28 -0400
        Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-05-17 07:53 -0600
          Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-05-17 09:40 -0600
            Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-17 11:53 -0400
              OT: Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions RedGrittyBrick <RedGrittyBrick@spamweary.invalid> - 2011-05-17 18:04 +0100
                Re: OT: Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-18 00:06 -0400

csiph-web