Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #7091
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.16.MISMATCH!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!w11g2000vbp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | "vbhavsar@gmail.com" <vbhavsar@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Singleton Pattern |
| Date | Sat, 13 Aug 2011 13:56:34 -0700 (PDT) |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Lines | 33 |
| Message-ID | <3be6e6cf-fa32-4503-9457-b0a1caef8f29@w11g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 67.82.47.84 |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| X-Trace | posting.google.com 1313269374 10460 127.0.0.1 (13 Aug 2011 21:02:54 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sat, 13 Aug 2011 21:02:54 +0000 (UTC) |
| Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| Injection-Info | w11g2000vbp.googlegroups.com; posting-host=67.82.47.84; posting-account=owoCbwkAAAApZ2tqH2muWAH9zAFnNJv9 |
| User-Agent | G2/1.0 |
| X-Google-Web-Client | true |
| X-Google-Header-Order | HNKRUAELSC |
| X-HTTP-UserAgent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/13.0.782.112 Safari/535.1,gzip(gfe) |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:7091 |
Show key headers only | View raw
People have been coming up with creative solutions to lazily implement
the singleton pattern in a thread-safe way. We have seen things like
double-checked locking and creating instance via a single-elemnt enum
type.
I have thought of yet another way to implement this in a lazy and
thread-safe way. I haven't seen this proposed anywhere and it seems to
work unless I am missing something. Here it goes:
public class Singleton {
private static Singleton _instance;
private Singleton(){}
private synchronized static void createInstance(){
_instance = new Singleton();
}
public static Singleton getInstance(){
if (_instance == null){
createInstance();
}
return _instance;
}
}
The synchronized createInstance() method would eliminate the need to
do double-checked locking and the synchronization would happen only
when multiple threads call getInstance() before _instance has been
instantiated.
Anyone see any issues with this?
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Singleton Pattern "vbhavsar@gmail.com" <vbhavsar@gmail.com> - 2011-08-13 13:56 -0700
Re: Singleton Pattern markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-13 14:41 -0700
Re: Singleton Pattern Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-13 14:48 -0700
Re: Singleton Pattern Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-08-13 16:43 -0700
Re: Singleton Pattern Ian <m4r35n357@gmail.com> - 2011-08-15 15:00 +0100
Re: Singleton Pattern Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-15 07:56 -0700
Re: Singleton Pattern Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-15 22:07 -0700
Re: Singleton Pattern Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-08-16 00:09 -0700
Re: Singleton Pattern Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-16 06:15 -0700
Re: Singleton Pattern Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-08-16 06:57 -0700
Re: Singleton Pattern Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-16 09:25 -0700
Re: Singleton Pattern Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-08-16 18:10 -0700
Re: Singleton Pattern Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-08-13 20:56 -0400
Re: Singleton Pattern Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-13 21:12 -0700
Re: Singleton Pattern Rajeev <rajeev.nospam@gmail.com> - 2011-08-14 06:37 -0700
csiph-web