Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #4221

Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions
Date	Tue, 17 May 2011 09:40:01 -0600
Organization	As little as possible
Lines	34
Message-ID	<2pr57xibe6.fsf@shell.xmission.com> (permalink)
References	<2ptyczln7x.fsf@shell.xmission.com> <iqmhbr$7kh$1@dont-email.me> <2pei3zkhw1.fsf@shell.xmission.com> <JMCdnZdUS79lUUzQnZ2dnUVZ_gOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <2pvcx9igb2.fsf@shell.xmission.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info	mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="dZdavj/jUDynNQgDq5jkeA"; logging-data="8649"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+u2e9DCACXz+80AKlHtKru"
User-Agent	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:5va+2ibqmM4h1OmPlDbhgkl+m7o= sha1:i5t8f8ah7jS81NPElmpxnBNZQ9k=
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:4221

Show key headers only | View raw

Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> writes:

> jebblue <n@n.nnn> writes:
>
>> On Sun, 15 May 2011 11:12:14 -0600, Jim Janney wrote:
>>
>>> Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> writes:
>>> 
>>>> Thu, 12 May 2011 13:42:42 -0600, /Jim Janney/:
>>>>
>>>>> The default spell checker in Eclipse doesn't think plugin is a word.
>>>>> OK, I can kind of see that.  But it doesn't like registry either.
>>>>> Hello?
>>>>
>>>> Just add the words to your user dictionary.
>>> 
>>> Of course.  I just found it amusing that Eclipse, well-known for its
>>> registry-based plugin architecture, would flag these words as possible
>>> misspellings.
>>
>> Plug-in is hyphenated. Plugin is not a word. Why is that surprising.
>
> One can argue whether it's a word, but it's definitely not a
> misspelling: many things that are not words are also not misspellings.
> And I didn't say surprising, only amusing, although I will plead guilty
> to being easily amused at times.

Now that I look carefully at the Eclipse documentation, I see they are
consistent in spelling it plug-in.

That's very different.  Never mind :-)

-- 
Jim Janney

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Eclipse spell checker omissions Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-05-12 13:42 -0600
  Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-13 14:44 +1200
  Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2011-05-14 21:23 +0300
    Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-05-15 11:12 -0600
      Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2011-05-16 01:17 +0300
        Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-05-16 08:51 -0600
          Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-16 11:22 -0400
      Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-16 14:25 +1200
        Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-15 22:28 -0400
      Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions jebblue <n@n.nnn> - 2011-05-16 20:18 -0500
        Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-16 21:28 -0400
        Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-05-17 07:53 -0600
          Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-05-17 09:40 -0600
            Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-17 11:53 -0400
              OT: Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions RedGrittyBrick <RedGrittyBrick@spamweary.invalid> - 2011-05-17 18:04 +0100
                Re: OT: Re: Eclipse spell checker omissions Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-18 00:06 -0400

csiph-web