Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #3070
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.16.MISMATCH!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!hg8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Jerry Gerrone <scuzwalla@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) |
| Date | Thu, 14 Apr 2011 20:12:20 -0700 (PDT) |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Lines | 9 |
| Message-ID | <2c8fec4a-7d61-43f9-b3bc-ac412328b63f@hg8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| References | <rb2mo6duf1kn037937sjrtht07omn3jdkm@4ax.com> <inielt$uok$1@news.albasani.net> <90gfdtFmkU2@mid.individual.net> <e380412e-ebc2-440d-96f4-4fc814c6f49b@i14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <90nvi7FlabU1@mid.individual.net> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 70.54.8.131 |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| X-Trace | posting.google.com 1302837140 2500 127.0.0.1 (15 Apr 2011 03:12:20 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Fri, 15 Apr 2011 03:12:20 +0000 (UTC) |
| Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| Injection-Info | hg8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=70.54.8.131; posting-account=6GRyxAoAAAAhauNvbG9PFjCexzy4eSSu |
| User-Agent | G2/1.0 |
| X-HTTP-UserAgent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.16) Gecko/20110319 Firefox/3.6.16 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0C),gzip(gfe) |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:3070 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Apr 14, 6:11 am, blm...@myrealbox.com <blm...@myrealbox.com> wrote: > I do think that if you're going to use [sic] at all in quoted > text -- which I'm inclined to dislike [*] -- it should be reserved > for egregious errors, not for matters of style. But whatever. > > [*] Perhaps because [implied insult deleted] No. None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at all true.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Binary Search Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-02 22:00 +1300
Re: Binary Search Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-04-02 05:07 -0500
Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-02 07:59 -0700
Re: Binary Search Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-04-02 10:37 -0500
Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-02 08:57 -0700
Re: Binary Search Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-04-03 12:40 +1200
Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-02 07:58 -0700
Re: Binary Search Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-02 11:11 -0400
Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-02 08:58 -0700
Re: Binary Search Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-03 00:11 +0100
Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-02 16:52 -0700
Re: Binary Search Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-03 18:50 +0100
Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-03 12:01 -0700
Re: Binary Search Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-03 22:39 +0100
Re: Binary Search "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-03 16:37 -0700
Re: Binary Search Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-06 15:24 -0400
OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm@myrealbox.com> - 2011-04-11 13:53 +0000
Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Lew <lew@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-11 11:45 -0700
Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-04-11 14:11 -0500
Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Lew <lew@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-11 13:48 -0700
Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-11 22:16 +0100
Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-11 17:54 -0400
Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-11 23:35 +0100
Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-04-11 21:41 -0500
Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm@myrealbox.com> - 2011-04-14 10:11 +0000
Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Jerry Gerrone <scuzwalla@gmail.com> - 2011-04-14 20:12 -0700
Re: OT "sic"? (was Re: Binary Search) Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 22:53 +0100
Re: Binary Search Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-04-05 16:01 +0100
csiph-web