Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #6815
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 |
| Date | Fri, 05 Aug 2011 14:46:21 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 23 |
| Message-ID | <23po371jco79r15913093laroirmsejtgi@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <list-20110802003845@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <8djj37pg6o35jb1b8lskefb4jmb2iadmbe@4ax.com> <nospam-9625F7.23364303082011@news.aioe.org> <4e3a5a4c$0$2527$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk> <9a04aaFp76U1@mid.individual.net> <j1eoba$uj6$1@dont-email.me> <Q7Odnef35YdGmqbTnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <j1f3ds$d7i$1@dont-email.me> <5-SdnQLc1oSKjqbTnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <4e3bb343$0$2491$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="7Qrvczazr82YckO5XW8Vtw"; logging-data="13037"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ASoRePoMIXlLiFh+NzbUaSJoQO7tUMIM=" |
| X-Newsreader | Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:MVKzmQyYgmeXyz5SElx/cEyF3RQ= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:6815 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 10:09:22 +0100, RedGrittyBrick
<RedGrittyBrick@spamweary.invalid> wrote:
>On 04/08/2011 22:46, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
[snip]
>> Why should the appropriateness of an operator overloading be affected by
>> who did it?
>It shouldn't but I imagine markspace's objection might have been that
>whilst we all learn about the varied uses of '+' at the start of
>learning Java, I expect it can be a little perplexing when you encounter
>a '+' that makes no sense until you find where the original programmer
>defined an overload of that operator. Even worse might be a '+' that
>apparently makes sense but where you do not realise that the operator
>has been overloaded. Is this possible?
Of course.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-08-03 15:40 -0700
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-08-03 20:53 -0300
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-08-03 21:10 -0400
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-08-03 21:22 -0700
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-08-03 23:36 -0400
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 RedGrittyBrick <RedGrittyBrick@spamweary.invalid> - 2011-08-04 09:37 +0100
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Chris Riesbeck <Chris.Riesbeck@gmail.com> - 2011-08-04 12:47 -0500
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-04 11:27 -0700
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-04 13:58 -0700
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-04 14:36 -0700
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-04 14:46 -0700
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 RedGrittyBrick <RedGrittyBrick@spamweary.invalid> - 2011-08-05 10:09 +0100
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-08-05 14:46 -0700
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-08-04 20:51 -0400
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Tim Slattery <Slattery_T@bls.gov> - 2011-08-05 08:38 -0400
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-05 10:22 +0000
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-10 09:05 -0700
csiph-web