Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #6799
| From | Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 |
| Date | 2011-08-04 20:51 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <j1ferp$mdm$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <nospam-9625F7.23364303082011@news.aioe.org> <4e3a5a4c$0$2527$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk> <9a04aaFp76U1@mid.individual.net> <j1eoba$uj6$1@dont-email.me> <Q7Odnef35YdGmqbTnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
On 8/4/2011 4:58 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> On 8/4/2011 11:27 AM, markspace wrote:
>> On 8/4/2011 10:47 AM, Chris Riesbeck wrote:
>>> In C++, an
>>> overloaded postfix ++
>>>
>> See? This is why I'm against any kind of operator overloading in Java.
>> Too much stupid out there.
>
> So what operator should have been used for String concatenation, instead
> of overloading "+"?
(Aside: I know of a language that used "||" for this purpose.)
This "overload" is feeble at best: "+" is overloaded six ways,
"-" five, "*", "/", "%", "++", "--", "<", "<=", ">", and ">=" four
each. "==" and "!=" and "=" and "." and "instanceof" are overloaded
to an infinite degree (countable, I think). So what?
--
Eric Sosman
esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-08-03 15:40 -0700
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-08-03 20:53 -0300
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-08-03 21:10 -0400
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-08-03 21:22 -0700
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-08-03 23:36 -0400
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 RedGrittyBrick <RedGrittyBrick@spamweary.invalid> - 2011-08-04 09:37 +0100
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Chris Riesbeck <Chris.Riesbeck@gmail.com> - 2011-08-04 12:47 -0500
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-04 11:27 -0700
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-04 13:58 -0700
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-04 14:36 -0700
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-04 14:46 -0700
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 RedGrittyBrick <RedGrittyBrick@spamweary.invalid> - 2011-08-05 10:09 +0100
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-08-05 14:46 -0700
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-08-04 20:51 -0400
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Tim Slattery <Slattery_T@bls.gov> - 2011-08-05 08:38 -0400
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-05 10:22 +0000
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-10 09:05 -0700
csiph-web