Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #12985
| Path | csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: What are the proper terms for these concepts? |
| Date | Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:57:32 -0700 (PDT) |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Lines | 20 |
| Message-ID | <19622318.119.1331672252346.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbjh8> (permalink) |
| References | <DmL7r.16914$wd1.15018@newsfe13.iad> <31042512.49.1331663127457.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcsk1> <ncO7r.46319$Bp4.19988@newsfe14.iad> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 69.28.149.29 |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| X-Trace | posting.google.com 1331672351 9100 127.0.0.1 (13 Mar 2012 20:59:11 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:59:11 +0000 (UTC) |
| In-Reply-To | <ncO7r.46319$Bp4.19988@newsfe14.iad> |
| Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| Injection-Info | glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.28.149.29; posting-account=CP-lKQoAAAAGtB5diOuGlDQk0jIwmH0T |
| User-Agent | G2/1.0 |
| X-Received-Bytes | 1851 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:12985 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Daniel Pitts wrote: > Lew wrote: >> The term "bearing" comes to mind, and I recall "absolute" vs. "relative" - let me double check. >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bearing_(navigation) >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relative_bearing >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_bearing >> >> The term "bearing" matches what you want as the augend. The addend you want is "angle". >> >> So you add an angle to a bearing to get a new bearing. >> > Ah, that actually makes a lot of sense, and generally that matches the > use of the value. It is use for things such as the heading of a robot, > missile, or other simulated item. There's some code to model in Robocode: <http://robocode.sourceforge.net/> -- Lew
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
What are the proper terms for these concepts? Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-03-13 10:21 -0700
Re: What are the proper terms for these concepts? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 11:25 -0700
Re: What are the proper terms for these concepts? Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-03-13 13:35 -0700
Re: What are the proper terms for these concepts? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 13:57 -0700
Re: What are the proper terms for these concepts? Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-03-14 09:07 -0700
Re: What are the proper terms for these concepts? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-13 23:17 -0400
Re: What are the proper terms for these concepts? Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-03-14 09:02 -0700
Re: What are the proper terms for these concepts? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 11:29 -0700
Re: What are the proper terms for these concepts? "Alex" <alex@foo.invalid> - 2012-03-13 21:49 +0000
Re: What are the proper terms for these concepts? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-03-14 15:30 -0700
Re: What are the proper terms for these concepts? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2012-03-15 01:09 +0000
Re: What are the proper terms for these concepts? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-03-14 18:24 -0700
Re: What are the proper terms for these concepts? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2012-03-15 22:05 +0000
csiph-web