Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #12973
| From | Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | What are the proper terms for these concepts? |
| Message-ID | <DmL7r.16914$wd1.15018@newsfe13.iad> (permalink) |
| Date | 2012-03-13 10:21 -0700 |
I have a few concepts in a program I'm writing, but I'm not sure if there are "canonical" terms for them, and would like to use those terms if possible. All these terms are for 2 dimensional shapes, but if there is a more general term for n dimensional I'd be interested in that as well, just for knowledge sake. In my codebase, it makes sense to distinguish between an absolute angle and a relative angle. Absolute angles are really relative to the fixed "east" vector, and Relative angles are clockwise or counter-clockwise rotations. You can scale relative angles, but not absolute angles. You can add relative angles to each other or to absolute angles, but absolute angles can't be added to each other. You can find a relative angle between two absolute angles. Is there a more formal concept of this? One thing I'm calling an "angle bracket", which is basically two angles, the absolute angle "clockwise-bound" and the relative angle "width". This can include a zero width bracket (basically just a ray), or an all inclusive bracket. If I add a radius to that (to make it a pie slice), the term I found is "sector". Is a full circle also a "sector"? How about if the angle is zero? Thanks in advance, Daniel.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
What are the proper terms for these concepts? Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-03-13 10:21 -0700
Re: What are the proper terms for these concepts? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 11:25 -0700
Re: What are the proper terms for these concepts? Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-03-13 13:35 -0700
Re: What are the proper terms for these concepts? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 13:57 -0700
Re: What are the proper terms for these concepts? Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-03-14 09:07 -0700
Re: What are the proper terms for these concepts? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-13 23:17 -0400
Re: What are the proper terms for these concepts? Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-03-14 09:02 -0700
Re: What are the proper terms for these concepts? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 11:29 -0700
Re: What are the proper terms for these concepts? "Alex" <alex@foo.invalid> - 2012-03-13 21:49 +0000
Re: What are the proper terms for these concepts? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-03-14 15:30 -0700
Re: What are the proper terms for these concepts? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2012-03-15 01:09 +0000
Re: What are the proper terms for these concepts? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-03-14 18:24 -0700
Re: What are the proper terms for these concepts? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2012-03-15 22:05 +0000
csiph-web