Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #8729
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: in praise of type checking |
| Date | Tue, 11 Oct 2011 19:10:49 -0700 (PDT) |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Lines | 11 |
| Message-ID | <1645106.226.1318385449515.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prmr25> (permalink) |
| References | <noiq87l3l9umnl3a74u5jd2c0pnlq21dat@4ax.com> <9f6hhqF717U1@mid.individual.net> <82lu87t4e47t1256r1vh7ich0esreter46@4ax.com> <9fb3m5F79oU1@mid.individual.net> <19264117.413.1318091736115.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prib32> <9fi3kpFt0eU1@mid.individual.net> |
| Reply-To | comp.lang.java.programmer@googlegroups.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 65.50.217.147 |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| X-Trace | posting.google.com 1318385449 12019 127.0.0.1 (12 Oct 2011 02:10:49 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:10:49 +0000 (UTC) |
| In-Reply-To | <9fi3kpFt0eU1@mid.individual.net> |
| Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| Injection-Info | glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.50.217.147; posting-account=CP-lKQoAAAAGtB5diOuGlDQk0jIwmH0T |
| User-Agent | G2/1.0 |
| X-Google-Web-Client | true |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:8729 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Monday, October 10, 2011 10:48:07 PM UTC-7, Robert Klemme wrote: > ... Your points are cogent and your conclusions make sense. Each tool in the toolshed has a purpose. I am not against dynamically-typed languages at all. One has to use the qualities of the tool to enhance one's purpose. No question that both sides offer value to the systems development process. -- Lew
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
in praise of type checking Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-05 23:33 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-10-06 06:43 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-10-06 09:52 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-07 12:43 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-10-07 14:57 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-10-07 20:18 -0400
Re: in praise of type checking Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-06 22:31 +0200
Re: in praise of type checking Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-07 12:36 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-08 16:05 +0200
Re: in praise of type checking Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-10-08 09:35 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-11 07:48 +0200
Re: in praise of type checking Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-10-11 13:04 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-10-11 17:52 -0300
Re: in praise of type checking Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-10-12 01:49 +0100
Re: in praise of type checking Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-10-11 19:12 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-10-11 19:10 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-10-06 20:29 -0400
Re: in praise of type checking Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-06 23:56 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Gunter Herrmann <notformail0106@earthlink.net> - 2011-10-07 13:57 -0400
Re: in praise of type checking Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-10-07 07:19 -0300
Re: in praise of type checking Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-07 12:39 -0700
Re: in praise of type checking Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-10-07 15:03 -0700
Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-10-11 19:26 +0100
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-10-12 01:15 -0500
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Travers Naran <tnaran@gmail.com> - 2011-10-12 07:23 -0700
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-10-12 20:04 +0000
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-10-12 13:53 -0700
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-10-12 16:55 -0500
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-10-12 15:02 -0700
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-10-13 00:08 -0500
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-10-13 07:48 -0300
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-10-14 07:09 -0400
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-10-12 22:03 +0000
Re: Space probes was Re: in praise of type checking Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-10-14 14:14 +0100
Re: in praise of type checking RedGrittyBrick <RedGrittyBrick@spamweary.invalid> - 2011-10-07 11:50 +0100
Re: in praise of [loosey goosey] type checking) RedGrittyBrick <RedGrittyBrick@spamweary.invalid> - 2011-10-07 12:20 +0100
Re: in praise of type checking Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-10-07 14:00 +0000
csiph-web