Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.help > #4246
| From | dale <dale@dalekelly.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer, comp.lang.java.help, sci.image.processing, sci.engr.color, rec.photo.digital, rec.photo.darkroom |
| Subject | Re: java still worthwhile? |
| Date | 2019-03-01 10:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <c187je.3o1.17.1@news.alt.net> (permalink) |
| References | <c113te.fnr.17.1@news.alt.net> <s4ghgr9cat7t.1w8n6yi832sbw$.dlg@40tude.net> |
Cross-posted to 6 groups.
On 3/1/2019 5:10 AM, Joerg Meier wrote: > On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:25:18 -0500, dale wrote: > >> Is java still worth my effort? Just a pastime and something resulting to >> note in my resume. I know the fundamentals of object oriented >> architecture, design and programming. Don't quite like using Netbeans >> IDE, or any other IDE, but could get used to it ... > > Java is huge, gigantic; by many metrics it is or is competing for the #1 > language globally. It is absolutely worth the effort. Due to the enourmous > ecosystem, the spread of Java is also all but guaranteed for the coming > decades. On the flip side, that does mean that there is a wide breadth of > knowledge that potential employees would like you to have - EE, Spring, > Hibernate, JPA, Struts, Vaadin, Dropwizard, GWT, play, Vert.x, just to name > a few. > > If you aim to ever actually work in a professional Java environment, I fear > you are ill advised by some of the replies you have gotten. I have > considered whether to broach that subject as I don't like putting down > fellow developers, but if you were to utter that you dont use an IDE or > that you use Ant in a job interview, you would be rightfully laughed out > the door at almost any employer. > > If you want to use Java in the job market, I would argue that you must at > least have a working familiarity with the following: > > - Either Eclipse or IntelliJ IDEA. Java is explicitly developed for use > from an IDE, and not using one will mark you as someone mentally stuck in > the 90s and unwilling to change. I'm sorry to state this so agressively, > but this point cannot be overstated. In the Java world, IDEs won, it's that > simple. We literally throw away applications that dont list one of the big > three IDEs in their skills section. > > - Maven and, optionally, Gradle. Maven is the de-facto standard of Java > development, with Gradle being the newer but still and possibly permanently > runner up. Ant is an antiquated tool that even at its prime was widely > loathed because it is quite horrible and that has been on a steep decline > since 2005. > > - Git, another de-facto standard of the professional Java world. Source > control is a must-have even if you work alone, and professional > colaborative work in this day and age is unthinkable without modern source > control software, and Git is a lonely leader in the Java world. > > - The basics of logging frameworks. Java has a bunch of these, but > thankfully, in the last few years, they have pretty much united under the > framework agnostic abstraction SLF4J. SLF4J being a facade, not a > framework, it allows you and others to use whatever logging framework you > prefer, while having the logging statements compatible. You will need a > founding in logging frameworks for really any serious Java project, no > matter whether you do front-end, back-end, middleware, batch jobs, games, > SaaS or any other thing that comes along tomorrow. > > Liebe Gruesse, > Joerg > Thanks for the detailed reply Joerg !!! Is Netbeans an acceptable IDE? How about github instead of git? -- dale - https://www.dalekelly.org/
Back to comp.lang.java.help | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
java still worthwhile? dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2019-02-26 17:25 -0500
Re: java still worthwhile? dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2019-02-26 18:37 -0500
Re: java still worthwhile? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2019-02-27 07:28 -0500
Re: java still worthwhile? dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2019-02-27 09:32 -0500
Re: java still worthwhile? Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2019-03-01 11:10 +0100
Re: java still worthwhile? dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2019-03-01 10:11 -0500
Re: java still worthwhile? Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2019-03-05 09:40 +0100
Re: java still worthwhile? dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2019-03-05 09:33 -0500
Re: java still worthwhile? John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-03-05 13:56 -0800
csiph-web