Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.help > #2043

Paul G. Derbyshire AKA Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - Derbyshire's sockpuppet on Eternal-september.org

Cross-posted to 9 groups.

Followups directed to: alt.paul-derbyshire.fix.it.now

Show all headers | View raw

AUK's July Kook Of The Month, Paul G. Derbyshire AKA Nadegda 
<nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:

> Followup-To: alt.usenet.kooks<SPANK>

DENIED, kook.  Groups added accordingly. 

> On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 01:51:15 +0000, This account has been banned because
> it violated the Google Groups Terms Of Use wrote:
> 
>> PS to my previous post -
>> 
>> 
>>> On  Wed, 15 Aug 2012 09:59:01 GMT, Steve Crook <steve@mixmin.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> snip
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> At this moment there are 6115 Tor nodes.  To my knowledge the only
>>>> user accessing the Mixmin Newsserver through them is Phoenix. 
>>>> Perhaps there are others, I haven't checked, but I believe it's safe
>>>> to say Phoenix is the only one involved in this issue.
>>>> 
>>>> Phoenix posts with a static From address so readers can easily filter
>>>> it. All Tor posts made through Mixmin are tagged [Tor] so readers can
>>>> also easily filter all Tor posts.  If they so desire, they can also
>>>> easily filter anything originating from Mixmin, regardless of Tor.
>>>> With all these options available, completely blocking 6115 nodes,
>>>> just to prevent Phoenix posting seems excessive and
>>>> counter-productive. 
>>>> 
>>>> The only action Phoenix has committed that I would consider abuse was
>>>> posting personal information about an individual and their workplace.
>>>> I strongly disagree with this and if it had continued, I would have
>>>> been forced to do something.  To my knowledge, it hasn't.
>>> 
>>> Without dates, it's hard to say. it has stopped.  However you may note
>>> the following, where the abuser has done so - most recently on August
>>> 13.
>>> 
>>> Message-ID: <jveeqv$6mc$1@news.mixmin.net> - August 2 Message-ID:
>>> <jveia4$c29$1@news.mixmin.net> - August 2 Message-ID:
>>> <jveqfa$p21$1@news.mixmin.net> - August 2 Message-ID:
>>> <jveqfd$p20$2@news.mixmin.net> - August 2 Message-ID:
>>> <jveu1i$v82$1@news.mixmin.net> - August 2 Message-ID:
>>> <jvgfv5$ffo$1@news.mixmin.net> - August 3 Message-ID:
>>> <jvgfv6$ffp$1@news.mixmin.net> - August 3 Message-ID:
>>> <jvgo3k$qo9$1@news.mixmin.net> - August 3 Message-ID:
>>> <jvgo3l$qoa$1@news.mixmin.net> - August 3 Message-ID:
>>> <jvgu3e$4bq$1@news.mixmin.net> - August 3 Message-ID:
>>> <jvgu3f$4bp$1@news.mixmin.net> - August 3 Message-ID:
>>> <jvgu3f$4bp$1@news.mixmin.net> - August 3 - a clearly defamatory post
>>> Message-ID: <jvgu3h$4bq$2@news.mixmin.net> - August 3 Message-ID:
>>> <jvgu3i$4bp$2@news.mixmin.net> - August 3 Message-ID:
>>> <jvgu3j$4bp$3@news.mixmin.net> - August 3 Message-ID:
>>> <k03j5e$beb$1@news.mixmin.net> - August 10 - nominated the person for
>>> an award Message-ID: <k0a4sl$3rg$1@news.mixmin.net> - August 13 -
>>> repeated the workplace and name.
>>> 
>>> It's also worth noting that the abuser has not provided any evidence
>>> whatsoever to show the poster he's stalking and defaming is actually
>>> the person in Belgium whom the abuser claims he is.
>> 
>> By looking on Google, it appears the abuser <FNVW@AltUsenetKooks.com>
>> has posted a follow-up to my previous post with a pair of URLs
>> containing the personal information of the person in Belgium whom the
>> abuser is using your service to stalk and defame - as shown in the MIDs
>> I previously posted, above.
>> 
>> However, the abuser has still completely failed to provide or identify
>> any evidence that the accused person in Belgium is making the Usenet
>> posts which the abuser is whining about, or is any way connected to
>> them.
> 
> Wrong:
> 
> <jveia4$c29$1@news.mixmin.net>
> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134551870900

No evidence present to connect the poster to the innocent man in Belgium.


> As that post indicates, go to
> 
> http://pb-beta.sybase.com/nntp-archive/action/
> article/1136377;jsessionid=0FA1D72B803296BF6C9133146232081D
> 
> (http://tinyurl.com/cywdgzd)

Links to a website and a posting made in May 2011. 

> and click the + left of "Danny Serlet" to see full headers. Observe 
> Scatboi's characteristic combo of MesNews/1.08.03.00-gb and X-ICQ: 
> 543516788.

So the only 'evidence' this pair of kooks have is a common "User-Agent"? 

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. 

> Oh, but Scatboi is a notorious forger of others' articles. Perhaps he
> was forging Serlet in this instance?
> 
> But wait, there's more! That post's headers also include this:
> 
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.221.23.2
> 
> which traces back to atlantis.adifo.be -- Serlet's workplace according
> to http://be.linkedin.com/in/dannyserlet -- so unless Scatboi works in
> the next cubicle over from Serlet, Scatboi *is* Serlet.

But Paula, where is that IP address in any postings to AUK, you fucking
kook? 
 
> Wait, the NNTP-Posting-Host might be faked? Check the Path. It's not 
> preloaded -- in fact it's barely loaded at all. The post was injected to
> a private server that doesn't apparently peer with the rest of Usenet 
> (but does peer with the web interface at the URL I gave). The NNTP-
> Posting-Host was probably set by that server. Note that the Sybase rep 
> that responded to Danny's post has a local 10.x.x.x IP in it.

The only evidence Derbyshite and the [Tard] kook have is a common
User-Agent. 

lol! 

 
> The evidence clearly indicates that Scatboi outed *himself* as Danny 
> Serlet on May 25, 2011 and has made only the weakest of attempts to 
> conceal his identity in subsequent usenet posts, since it would be easy 
> for him to alter those particular post headers if he so chose.

The only 'evidence' this pair of kooks have is a common "User-Agent".

 
>> The only connection to this person has been created by the
>> misdirected stalking efforts of the abuser <FNVW@AltUsenetKooks.com>.
> 
> That's rich, coming from a stalking abuser.
> 
>> Since the abuser lacks any evidence that person in Belgium is anywhere
>> near AUK,<SPANK>
> 
> See above.

The only 'evidence' you pair of kooks have is a common "User-Agent".

lol!

>> should the innocent person continue to be defamed by the
>> craven coward posting as <FNVW@AltUsenetKooks.com> who justifies his
>> despicable acts with what amounts to 'it's him, just take my word for
>> it, nudge-nudge-wink-wink'?
> 
> My irony meter just exploded and drove a piece of shrapnel into my cheek
> next to my left eye! I'm sending you the medical bill and it had BETTER 
> not scar or YOU are IN FOR IT. :P

Sue me, Paul G. Derbyshite - like you've threatened to do to other people.

> It's incredible, folks. Yes, the same person who justifies his own 
> despicable acts with what amounts to "it's Derbyshire, just take my word
> for it, nudge-nudge-wink-wink"<SPANK>

Bullshit, Paula; I've proven how your aioe.org sockpuppets have all 
displayed  common IP addresses, posting hosts, posting histories, and 
the logs from aioe.org itself - more than one single element, in each 
and every case. 

And the only 'evidence' you pair of kooks have is a common "User-Agent".

lol!

Of course, one of your retarded sockpuppets will second your faux nomination, 
Paula. 

-- 
<T><A><H><B><B><B><I><V><T><G><G><T><O><U> - "Vile Little Fucker" #1
          ^^^^^^^^?_______(my hook which the Peg Boi keeps biting)
If you want to see something lamer than John Edward Kook's Aratzio frogeries, 
                   check out Scatboi's forgeries.

Anonypussy the [Tard] <fnvw@altusenetkooks.com> is the Official AUK Peg Boi.
(after IKYABWAI, PeeWees, outer filthing and lies, Anonypussy is out of ammo)
The killfiled kook gets a SPANK http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ED9c_d4eL1U

Paul Derbyshire gets tarred and feathered - <5smbjh.a6j.19.2@news.alt.net>

Back to comp.lang.java.help | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Paul G. Derbyshire AKA Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - Derbyshire's sockpuppet on Eternal-september.org This account has been banned because it violated the Google Groups Terms Of Use <laughing@u.kook> - 2012-08-21 04:24 +0000

csiph-web