Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.gui > #1384 > unrolled thread

Re: Is SWT conform to Jav

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.gui

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Is SWT conform to Jav heartup@gmail.com.remove-dii-this - 2011-04-27 15:33 +0000
    Re: Is SWT conform to Jav "Andrew T." <andrew.t.@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:33 +0000

#1384 — Re: Is SWT conform to Jav

  To: comp.lang.java.gui
On Apr 4, 4:04 pm, "Andrew T." <u32984@uwe> wrote:
> hear...@gmail.com wrote:
> >I know that AWT and Swing all conform to JavaBeans specification, but
> >what about SWT?
>
> I don't know, but how are you intending to make the SWT
> libraries available to your bean?  (Are these beans intended
> for use with JSP/Servlets?)
>
> --
> Andrew Thompsonhttp://www.athompson.info/andrew/
>
> Message posted via JavaKB.comhttp://www.javakb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/java-gui/200704/1

While, I think if SWT doesn't conform to JavaBeans specification, then
it would be much difficult to build a GUI builder for SWT.
Eclipse Visual Editor plug-in has a package name JEM(Java EMF Model).
Does this related to make SWT like Beans?

---
 * Synchronet * The Whitehouse BBS --- whitehouse.hulds.com --- check it out free usenet!
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.92
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1385

  To: comp.lang.java.gui
heartup@gmail.com wrote:
>> hear...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >I know that AWT and Swing all conform to JavaBeans specification, but
(SWT?)

>While, I think if SWT doesn't conform to JavaBeans specification, then
>it would be much difficult to build a GUI builder for SWT.
>Eclipse Visual Editor plug-in has a package name JEM(Java EMF Model).
>Does this related to make SWT like Beans?

Given the EVE, JEM, EMF & SWT are all things I don't
have installed here, all I can say is (shrugs) I dunno'.
What did the documentation that came with the 
abovementioned, suggest?

My point about JSP/Servlets was that the SWT
classes need to be available to the client before
they will work.  It is tricky to deliver different classes
to different OS's in a web page, so there is an extra 
difficulty in that SWT has platform specific shared 
lib's (AFAIR).

I could not imagine SWT would be used much for 
(either applets or) JavaBeans embedded in web pages.

-- 
Andrew Thompson
http://www.athompson.info/andrew/

Message posted via JavaKB.com
http://www.javakb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/java-gui/200704/1

---
 * Synchronet * The Whitehouse BBS --- whitehouse.hulds.com --- check it out free usenet!
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.92
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.gui

csiph-web