Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.gui > #1385
| From | "Andrew T." <andrew.t.@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Is SWT conform to Jav |
| Message-ID | <7031866e3cac7@uwe> (permalink) |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.gui |
| References | <1175676381.146466.42410@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> |
| Date | 2011-04-27 15:33 +0000 |
| Organization | TDS.net |
To: comp.lang.java.gui heartup@gmail.com wrote: >> hear...@gmail.com wrote: >> >I know that AWT and Swing all conform to JavaBeans specification, but (SWT?) >While, I think if SWT doesn't conform to JavaBeans specification, then >it would be much difficult to build a GUI builder for SWT. >Eclipse Visual Editor plug-in has a package name JEM(Java EMF Model). >Does this related to make SWT like Beans? Given the EVE, JEM, EMF & SWT are all things I don't have installed here, all I can say is (shrugs) I dunno'. What did the documentation that came with the abovementioned, suggest? My point about JSP/Servlets was that the SWT classes need to be available to the client before they will work. It is tricky to deliver different classes to different OS's in a web page, so there is an extra difficulty in that SWT has platform specific shared lib's (AFAIR). I could not imagine SWT would be used much for (either applets or) JavaBeans embedded in web pages. -- Andrew Thompson http://www.athompson.info/andrew/ Message posted via JavaKB.com http://www.javakb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/java-gui/200704/1 --- * Synchronet * The Whitehouse BBS --- whitehouse.hulds.com --- check it out free usenet! --- Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.92 Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
Back to comp.lang.java.gui | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Is SWT conform to Jav heartup@gmail.com.remove-dii-this - 2011-04-27 15:33 +0000 Re: Is SWT conform to Jav "Andrew T." <andrew.t.@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:33 +0000
csiph-web