Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.gui > #4579

Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT?

Show all headers | View raw

On 06/05/2011 05:46 PM, markspace wrote:
> On 6/4/2011 5:38 PM, Knute Johnson wrote:
>> If you want to remove some data from the EDT and use it in another
>> thread, does EventQueue.invokeLater() or invokeAndWait() constitute
>> happens before? I don't think it does,
>
> Yes and no.
>
> You are correct, SwingUtilities.invokeLater() does NOT specify that it
> creates a happens-before relationship. I've griped about this before on
> this group. I think it should, because it's almost impossible to use
> correctly if it does not.
>
> However, if you look at the implementation, you can see it uses an
> Executor to hand off your runnable to the EDT. And the Executor method
> invoked does, in fact, specify a happens before relationship. And I
> can't think of any way to hand off one object (the runnable) to another
> thread with out creating a happens-before relationship. So as a
> practical matter, I think you must be ok if you don't synchronize yourself.
>
> If feel you must synchronzie (and I don't disagree), the easiest way
> might be to just create a volatile field in the Runnable and let that
> synchronize for you.
>
> class MyRunnable implements Runnable {
> public volatile int synch;
> public void run() {
> synch++; // read synch
> // do stuff here...
>
> }
> }
> ...
> MyRunnable run = new MyRunnable();
> run.synch = 42;
> SwingUtilities.invokeLater( run );
> ...
>
> This is the best I think I can do.
>

volatile int sync;

// in the current thread
// do something you want visible on the EDT

++sync;  // write

EventQueue.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
     public void run() {
         ++sync;  // read
         // the something is now visible here on EDT

I think that would work too.

-- 

Knute Johnson
s/knute/nospam/

Back to comp.lang.java.gui | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-06-04 17:38 -0700
  Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-06-04 17:50 -0700
  Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-06-05 17:52 +0200
    Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-06-05 10:47 -0700
      Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-05 23:47 -0400
        Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-06-05 22:11 -0700
          Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-06-06 14:31 +0200
          Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-06 23:03 -0400
            Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-06-07 18:51 +0200
              Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-07 13:38 -0400
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-06-08 00:10 +0200
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-07 23:51 -0400
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-06-10 01:17 +0200
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-06-10 01:25 +0200
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-09 22:34 -0400
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-06-10 05:22 +0200
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? markspace <-@.> - 2011-06-10 08:04 -0700
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-10 21:13 -0400
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-06-12 12:51 -0700
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? markspace <-@.> - 2011-06-07 23:31 -0700
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-06-08 23:07 -0700
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-09 18:35 -0400
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-06-12 12:45 -0700
            Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-06-08 23:05 -0700
              Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-09 14:35 -0400
  Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-06-05 13:39 -0700
    Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-06-05 22:17 -0700
      Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? markspace <-@.> - 2011-06-07 14:51 -0700
  Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? markspace <-@.> - 2011-06-05 17:46 -0700
    Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-06-05 22:41 -0700
      Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-06-06 14:35 +0200

csiph-web