Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.gui > #4589

Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT?

From Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.gui
Subject Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT?
References (1 earlier) <isg8ng$i6u$1@dont-email.me> <8jPGp.40014$Vp.14760@newsfe14.iad> <nospam-0D155A.23474105062011@news.aioe.org> <TjZGp.40183$Vp.29218@newsfe14.iad> <nospam-7A4754.23033306062011@news.aioe.org>
Message-ID <RnZHp.2348$5v5.495@newsfe11.iad> (permalink)
Organization NewsDemon
Date 2011-06-08 23:05 -0700

Show all headers | View raw


On 06/06/2011 08:03 PM, John B. Matthews wrote:
> In article<TjZGp.40183$Vp.29218@newsfe14.iad>,
>   Knute Johnson<nospam@knutejohnson.com>  wrote:
>
>> On 06/05/2011 08:47 PM, John B. Matthews wrote:
> [...]
>>> Focusing on invokeAndWait() [1], I understood it to be the standard
>>> way to wait for data to arrive on the EDT. In particular, it
>>> promises to block until the supplied Runnable's run method has been
>>> called on the EDT. I don't understand why the Runnable needs a
>>> synchronized block.
>>
>> The problem with using invokeAndWait() is that it won't block if the
>> thread is interrupted and it won't start the Runnable() either.
>
> The InvocationEvent is posted to the event queue and the calling thread
> immediately enters wait(). It's up to the AWT event thread to dispatch
> the enclosed Runnable.
>
>> The synchronized block is to make sure that the data retrieved from the
>> GUI elements on the EDT were visible to the current thread.
>
> Both invokeAndWait() (on the calling thread) and dispatch() (on the EDT)
> synchronize on the (private) AWTInvocationLock.
>
>> I've come up with what I think is a better way for the project I'm
>> working on and that is to use a Semaphore.
>>
>> Semaphore sem = new Semaphore(1); [...]
>
> This looks appealing; it reminds me of DF's suggestion of Exchanger.
>
> [...]
>
>> So John, back to your question about the synchronized block, how
>> would you get data from the EDT to your current thread without some
>> sort of synchronization?
>
> Here's my (contrived) sscce. A javax.swing.Timer increments  an int at
> 100 Hz, while a java.util.TimerTask samples the value at 1 Hz. I'd like
> the API to be a little more explicit, but it does say that the calling
> thread blocks and the Runnable's dispatch "will happen after all pending
> events are processed."
>
> import java.awt.EventQueue;
> import java.awt.event.ActionEvent;
> import java.awt.event.ActionListener;
> import java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException;
> import java.util.LinkedList;
> import java.util.TimerTask;
> import javax.swing.JFrame;
> import javax.swing.JLabel;
> import javax.swing.JPanel;
> import javax.swing.Timer;
>
> /** @author John B. Matthews */
> public class TwoTimer extends JPanel {
>
>      private Timer timer = new Timer(10, null);
>      private int value;
>
>      public TwoTimer() {
>          final JLabel label = new JLabel("0");
>          timer.addActionListener(new ActionListener() {
>
>              @Override
>              public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
>                  label.setText(String.valueOf(value++));
>              }
>          });
>          this.add(label);
>      }
>
>      public int getValue() {
>          return value;
>      }
>
>      public void startSwingTimer() {
>          timer.start();
>      }
>
>      public void startUtilTimer() {
>          final LinkedList<Integer>  samples = new LinkedList<Integer>();
>          java.util.Timer sampler = new java.util.Timer();
>          sampler.scheduleAtFixedRate(new TimerTask() {
>
>              @Override
>              public void run() {
>                  try {
>                      EventQueue.invokeAndWait(new Runnable() {
>
>                          @Override
>                          public void run() {
>                              samples.add(getValue());
>                          }
>                      });
>                  } catch (InterruptedException ex) {
>                      ex.printStackTrace(System.err);
>                  } catch (InvocationTargetException ex) {
>                      ex.printStackTrace(System.err);
>                  }
>                  System.out.println(samples.getLast());
>              }
>          }, 1000, 1000);
>
>      }
>
>      private void display() {
>          JFrame f = new JFrame("TwoTimer");
>          f.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
>          f.add(this);
>          f.pack();
>          f.setLocationRelativeTo(null);
>          f.setVisible(true);
>      }
>
>      public static void main(String[] args) {
>          EventQueue.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
>
>              @Override
>              public void run() {
>                  TwoTimer tt = new TwoTimer();
>                  tt.display();
>                  tt.startSwingTimer();
>                  tt.startUtilTimer();
>              }
>          });
>      }
> }
>

John:

If the AWTInvocationLock is what is used around the wait() then I think 
your access to the the LinkedList is adequately synchronized.  A problem 
could occur if the timer thread is interrupted, then the wait() will not 
wait until the run() method is complete and you could find that the 
LinkedList is some incomplete or unstable state in the timer thread.  I 
think the risk is probably fairly small though.  And in this case the 
outcome is probably not a problem.

The example I had with the Semaphores could have a similar issue.  If 
the thread was interrupted it would cause the retrieved data to get ignored.

Did you look through the code for invokeLater(), does it have any 
synchronization?

-- 

Knute Johnson
s/knute/nospam/

Back to comp.lang.java.gui | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-06-04 17:38 -0700
  Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-06-04 17:50 -0700
  Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-06-05 17:52 +0200
    Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-06-05 10:47 -0700
      Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-05 23:47 -0400
        Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-06-05 22:11 -0700
          Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-06-06 14:31 +0200
          Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-06 23:03 -0400
            Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-06-07 18:51 +0200
              Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-07 13:38 -0400
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-06-08 00:10 +0200
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-07 23:51 -0400
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-06-10 01:17 +0200
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-06-10 01:25 +0200
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-09 22:34 -0400
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-06-10 05:22 +0200
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? markspace <-@.> - 2011-06-10 08:04 -0700
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-10 21:13 -0400
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-06-12 12:51 -0700
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? markspace <-@.> - 2011-06-07 23:31 -0700
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-06-08 23:07 -0700
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-09 18:35 -0400
                Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-06-12 12:45 -0700
            Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-06-08 23:05 -0700
              Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-09 14:35 -0400
  Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-06-05 13:39 -0700
    Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-06-05 22:17 -0700
      Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? markspace <-@.> - 2011-06-07 14:51 -0700
  Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? markspace <-@.> - 2011-06-05 17:46 -0700
    Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-06-05 22:41 -0700
      Re: Synchronization when collecting data from the EDT? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-06-06 14:35 +0200

csiph-web