Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.gui > #5193
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.gui |
| Subject | Re: Overriding JComponent or implementing ComponentUI? |
| Date | Mon, 09 Jul 2012 23:30:48 -0700 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Lines | 27 |
| Message-ID | <jtgi6o$va0$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <kN1Ir.59786$GJ4.56436@newsfe16.iad> <jtfqbg$4uo$1@dont-email.me> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | news.albasani.net we0732cPCjeJ7A9ZgfBHEYycplPCI1gb86K3ZBZ/iMRdzDZmDtp8uk4I1S2kKt7/1RquY3v65atJROxx52Ywc6omq/CsNN3gLIPUYuqKRxC+n8HvqPneMM1bxle6xux1 |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Tue, 10 Jul 2012 06:30:48 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | news.albasani.net; logging-data="TMDqAwiObf69Y7U21aL3A7koro7PEIACrc8jJkmDcitHurASOz9/wMZPE5/ODZMadF35+BfVbxZ1yE5SPrcmI5w+Z76cm65RlwsbxgnEsFLjwm8XVuH20qp4n/27tosw"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1 |
| In-Reply-To | <jtfqbg$4uo$1@dont-email.me> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:c4OmgyTCkre/5GC/DMctebG0Wr0= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.gui:5193 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Daniele Futtorovic wrote: > FWIW (as it's been a while I've done GUI code), the more complex and > specialised custom components I wrote, the further I lent towards > ComponentUIs. Unfortunately, I don't remember any exact benefit. Perhaps > a matter of cleanness and encapsulation (as it feels "more right" to put > that code in a dedicated place, rather than overriding stuff in the > component). There's also the issue of shared resources, although those > can be dealt with similarly in JComponent. > > I realise that was a terribly useless post. Sorry about that. :) Honestly, I thought it was going to be useless for a second, but it turned out to be rather thought-provoking and best-practice oriented. Assuming I understood your remarks correctly. Josh Bloch says, "Prefer composition to inheritance." In GUI terms this translates to, "Usually you have a JFrame as a member rather than as a supertype." -- Lew Honi soit qui mal y pense. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Friz.jpg
Back to comp.lang.java.gui | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Overriding JComponent or implementing ComponentUI? Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-07-01 12:45 -0700
Re: Overriding JComponent or implementing ComponentUI? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-07-01 20:11 -0400
Re: Overriding JComponent or implementing ComponentUI? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-07-05 07:40 -0700
Re: Overriding JComponent or implementing ComponentUI? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-07-05 21:11 -0400
Re: Overriding JComponent or implementing ComponentUI? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-07-05 21:06 -0400
Re: Overriding JComponent or implementing ComponentUI? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-07-10 01:42 +0200
Re: Overriding JComponent or implementing ComponentUI? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-07-09 23:30 -0700
Re: Overriding JComponent or implementing ComponentUI? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-07-10 20:18 +0200
Re: Overriding JComponent or implementing ComponentUI? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-07-10 13:25 -0700
csiph-web